On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Igor Yu. Zhbanov wrote:
> I think your testprogram is broken (or else my testprogram is broken :).
Yes, you were right. Mine must have been broken (possibly caused by
trying to make it readable :). Thanks.
Alan, if you still have the patch please apply it to smbfs in 2.2
(a
Hello, sorry for slow response.
(I have lost and found your first letter.)
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Urban Widmark wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Igor Yu. Zhbanov wrote:
>
...
>
> > I have found a bug in drivers of file systems which use a DOS-like format
> > of date (16 bit: years since 1980 - 7 bits
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Igor Yu. Zhbanov wrote:
> Hello!
Hello again
> As I see now in 2.2.18pre24 NCPFS is fixed but VFAT and SMBFS doesn't. (This
> happened because the maintainer of NCPFS resent my patch to Alan Cox but only the
> part of patch related to NCPFS). So I resent you patch for VFAT a
Hello!
Few weeks ago I have sent the following letter:
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Igor Yu. Zhbanov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have found a bug in drivers of file systems which use a DOS-like format
> of date (16 bit: years since 1980 - 7 bits, month - 4 bits, day - 5 bits).
>
> There are two problems:
>
Hello!
I have found a bug in drivers of file systems which use a DOS-like format
of date (16 bit: years since 1980 - 7 bits, month - 4 bits, day - 5 bits).
There are two problems:
1) It is unable to convert UNIX-like dates before 1980 to DOS-like date format.
2) VFAT for example have three kinds
5 matches
Mail list logo
