On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> The patch will not fix the underlying problem, but just make it behave
>> more like it was and allow partial message reads. This is a years old
>> problem, the net is full of bugreports of stuff going wrong with
>> running dd bs=1 on /proc/kmsg. I
> The patch will not fix the underlying problem, but just make it behave
> more like it was and allow partial message reads. This is a years old
> problem, the net is full of bugreports of stuff going wrong with
> running dd bs=1 on /proc/kmsg. It is a really stupid idea, and can not
> work for man
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 08:45:44PM +0300, Jukka Ollila wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> A few days ago I filed a kernel regression report concerning a change
>> in /proc/kmsg behaviour with short reads:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44211
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 08:45:44PM +0300, Jukka Ollila wrote:
>> A few days ago I filed a kernel regression report concerning a change
>> in /proc/kmsg behaviour with short reads:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44211
> I think we
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 08:45:44PM +0300, Jukka Ollila wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A few days ago I filed a kernel regression report concerning a change
> in /proc/kmsg behaviour with short reads:
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44211
>
> The comments suggest that this is probably intent
Hello,
A few days ago I filed a kernel regression report concerning a change
in /proc/kmsg behaviour with short reads:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44211
The comments suggest that this is probably intentional, but that it
would be best make sure that the current semantics wrt shor
6 matches
Mail list logo
