Re: Boot failure on gru-scarlet-inx with 5.9-rc2

2020-09-03 Thread Samuel Dionne-Riel
On Thu, 03 Sep 2020 16:59:30 +0100 Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 2020-09-03 15:35, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 3:19 AM Lorenzo Pieralisi > > wrote: > >> > >> Ok I think I understand what the problem is. > >> > >> Can you give this patch a shot please ? I think we are > >> derefe

Re: Boot failure on gru-scarlet-inx with 5.9-rc2

2020-09-03 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 2020-09-03 15:35, Rob Herring wrote: On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 3:19 AM Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 11:47:56PM -0400, Samuel Dionne-Riel wrote: > On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 17:01:19 +0100 > Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 02:33:56PM -0400, Samuel Dionne-Riel

Re: Boot failure on gru-scarlet-inx with 5.9-rc2

2020-09-03 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 3:19 AM Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 11:47:56PM -0400, Samuel Dionne-Riel wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 17:01:19 +0100 > > Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 02:33:56PM -0400, Samuel Dionne-Riel wrote: > > > > > > Please print

Re: Boot failure on gru-scarlet-inx with 5.9-rc2

2020-09-03 Thread Lorenzo Pieralisi
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 11:47:56PM -0400, Samuel Dionne-Riel wrote: > On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 17:01:19 +0100 > Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 02:33:56PM -0400, Samuel Dionne-Riel wrote: > > > > Please print a pointer as a pointer and print both bus and > > bus->parent. > > Ho

Re: Boot failure on gru-scarlet-inx with 5.9-rc2

2020-09-02 Thread Samuel Dionne-Riel
On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 17:01:19 +0100 Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 02:33:56PM -0400, Samuel Dionne-Riel wrote: > > Please print a pointer as a pointer and print both bus and > bus->parent. Hopefully pointer as a pointer is %px. Not sure what else, if that's wrong please tell.

Re: Boot failure on gru-scarlet-inx with 5.9-rc2

2020-09-02 Thread Lorenzo Pieralisi
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 02:33:56PM -0400, Samuel Dionne-Riel wrote: > On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 17:42:49 +0100 > Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 04:37:42PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > On 2020-09-01 04:45, Samuel Dionne-Riel wrote: > > > > - if (pci_is_root_bus(bus->pa

Re: Boot failure on gru-scarlet-inx with 5.9-rc2

2020-09-01 Thread Samuel Dionne-Riel
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 17:42:49 +0100 Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 04:37:42PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On 2020-09-01 04:45, Samuel Dionne-Riel wrote: > > > - if (pci_is_root_bus(bus->parent) && dev > 0) > > > + if (bus->primary == rockchip->root_bus_nr && dev > 0) > >

Re: Boot failure on gru-scarlet-inx with 5.9-rc2

2020-09-01 Thread Lorenzo Pieralisi
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 04:37:42PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 2020-09-01 04:45, Samuel Dionne-Riel wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 10:27:37 +0100 > > Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > > > > Ah, so actually anything that *enables pcie* kills your system. > > > Great investigative work! > > > > > > >

Re: Boot failure on gru-scarlet-inx with 5.9-rc2

2020-09-01 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 2020-09-01 04:45, Samuel Dionne-Riel wrote: On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 10:27:37 +0100 Marc Zyngier wrote: Ah, so actually anything that *enables pcie* kills your system. Great investigative work! > > And backed by a further bisection with this that points to > d84c572de1a360501d2e439ac632126f5fac

Re: Boot failure on gru-scarlet-inx with 5.9-rc2

2020-08-31 Thread Samuel Dionne-Riel
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 10:27:37 +0100 Marc Zyngier wrote: > > Ah, so actually anything that *enables pcie* kills your system. > Great investigative work! > > > > > And backed by a further bisection with this that points to > > d84c572de1a360501d2e439ac632126f5facf59d being the actual change > > th

Re: Boot failure on gru-scarlet-inx with 5.9-rc2

2020-08-31 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 2020-08-31 08:18, Samuel Dionne-Riel wrote: On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 10:41:42 +0100 Marc Zyngier wrote: Hi, Could you try replacing the problematic patch with [1], and let me know whether this changes anything on your end? This patch probably isn't the right approach, but it would certainly he

Re: Boot failure on gru-scarlet-inx with 5.9-rc2

2020-08-31 Thread Samuel Dionne-Riel
On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 10:41:42 +0100 Marc Zyngier wrote: Hi, > > Could you try replacing the problematic patch with [1], and let me > know whether this changes anything on your end? This patch probably > isn't the right approach, but it would certainly help pointing me > in the right direction. >

Re: Boot failure on gru-scarlet-inx with 5.9-rc2

2020-08-30 Thread Samuel Dionne-Riel
On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 10:41:42 +0100 Marc Zyngier wrote: Hi, Thanks for the reply. > Hi Samuel, > > On 2020-08-29 21:54, Samuel Dionne-Riel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The patch "of: address: Work around missing device_type property in > > pcie nodes" by Marc Zyngier, > > d1ac0002dd297069bb8448c2764

Re: Boot failure on gru-scarlet-inx with 5.9-rc2

2020-08-30 Thread Marc Zyngier
Hi Samuel, On 2020-08-29 21:54, Samuel Dionne-Riel wrote: Hi, The patch "of: address: Work around missing device_type property in pcie nodes" by Marc Zyngier, d1ac0002dd297069bb8448c2764c9c31c4668441, causes the "DUMO" variant of the gru-scarlet-inx, at the very least, to not boot. A gru-kevin

Boot failure on gru-scarlet-inx with 5.9-rc2

2020-08-29 Thread Samuel Dionne-Riel
Hi, The patch "of: address: Work around missing device_type property in pcie nodes" by Marc Zyngier, d1ac0002dd297069bb8448c2764c9c31c4668441, causes the "DUMO" variant of the gru-scarlet-inx, at the very least, to not boot. A gru-kevin reportedly had no issues booting (further), though it most li