Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic - Linux 2.6.20-rc2-ga3d89517

2006-12-26 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 18:15:31 +0100 Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > some days and will let you know if the problem represents. Please note > > that it happened only twice and I don't have any clue on how to > > reproduce it. > > > > I added Pavel and Rafael to CC-list because for the first time i

Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic - Linux 2.6.20-rc2-ga3d89517

2006-12-26 Thread Fabio Comolli
Hi On 12/26/06, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi! > some days and will let you know if the problem represents. Please note > that it happened only twice and I don't have any clue on how to > reproduce it. > > I added Pavel and Rafael to CC-list because for the first time in at > least

Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic - Linux 2.6.20-rc2-ga3d89517

2006-12-26 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > some days and will let you know if the problem represents. Please note > that it happened only twice and I don't have any clue on how to > reproduce it. > > I added Pavel and Rafael to CC-list because for the first time in at > least six months my laptop failed to resume after suspend-to-di

Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic - Linux 2.6.20-rc2-ga3d89517

2006-12-25 Thread Fabio Comolli
OK, I applied your patch to yesterday's Linus' GIT. I will run it for some days and will let you know if the problem represents. Please note that it happened only twice and I don't have any clue on how to reproduce it. I added Pavel and Rafael to CC-list because for the first time in at least six

Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic - Linux 2.6.20-rc2-ga3d89517

2006-12-24 Thread OGAWA Hirofumi
"Fabio Comolli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just found this in syslog. It was during normal activity, about 6 > minutes after resume-from-ram. I never saw this before. It seems someone missed to check PREEMPT_ACTIVE in __resched_legal(). Could you please test the following patch? -- OGAWA Hiro