On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:46:25 +0100 Mel Gorman
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:35:18AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:00:30 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven
> > wrote:
> >
> > > In the mean time my tests completed successfully with both patches
> > > applied.
> >
> > Can we
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:35:18AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:00:30 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
>
> > In the mean time my tests completed successfully with both patches applied.
>
> Can we please identify "both patches" with specificity? I have the
> below one.
>
On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:00:30 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> In the mean time my tests completed successfully with both patches applied.
Can we please identify "both patches" with specificity? I have the
below one.
From: Mel Gorman
Subject: mm, page_alloc: recalculate the preferred zoneref
Hi Mel,
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:57:22AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Andrew Morton
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 13:19:36 +0100 Mel Gorman
>> > wrote:
>> >> > >Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
>> >> >
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:57:22AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Andrew, Mel,
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Andrew Morton
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 13:19:36 +0100 Mel Gorman
> > wrote:
> >> > >Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
> >> >
> >> > Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
> >> >
> >>
>
Hi Andrew, Mel,
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 13:19:36 +0100 Mel Gorman
> wrote:
>> > >Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
>> >
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> I queued this. A tested-by:Geert would be nice?
>
>
> From: Mel Gorman
> Su
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 11:43:41 -0700 Andrew Morton
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 13:19:36 +0100 Mel Gorman
> wrote:
>
> > > >Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
> > >
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> I queued this. A tested-by:Geert would be nice?
>
>
> F
On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 13:19:36 +0100 Mel Gorman
wrote:
> > >Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
> >
> > Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka
> >
>
> Thanks.
I queued this. A tested-by:Geert would be nice?
From: Mel Gorman
Subject: mm, page_alloc: recalculate the preferred zoneref if the context can
ignore me
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 02:04:42PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 06/02/2016 12:39 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 12:01:24PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >>>Why?
> >>>
> >>>The comment is fine but I do not see why the recalculation would occur.
> >>>
> >>>In the original co
On 06/02/2016 12:39 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 12:01:24PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
Why?
The comment is fine but I do not see why the recalculation would occur.
In the original code, the preferred_zoneref for statistics is calculated
based on either the supplied nodemask
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 12:01:24PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > Why?
> >
> > The comment is fine but I do not see why the recalculation would occur.
> >
> > In the original code, the preferred_zoneref for statistics is calculated
> > based on either the supplied nodemask or cpuset_current_me
On 06/01/2016 11:19 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:44:24PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 05/30/2016 05:56 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
>>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>>> index dba8cfd0b2d6..f2c1e47adc11 100644
>>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:44:24PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 05/30/2016 05:56 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index dba8cfd0b2d6..f2c1e47adc11 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -3232,6 +3232,9 @@ __alloc_pages_slo
On 05/30/2016 05:56 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index dba8cfd0b2d6..f2c1e47adc11 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -3232,6 +3232,9 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int
> order,
>* allocations a
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:28:05AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Mel,
>
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Mel Gorman
> wrote:
> > Thanks. Please try the following instead
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index bb320cde4d6d..557549c81083 100644
> > --- a/mm/page
Hi Mel,
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Thanks. Please try the following instead
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index bb320cde4d6d..557549c81083 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -3024,6 +3024,7 @@ get_page_from_freelist(gfp_t g
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 07:37:39PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index dba8cfd0b2d6..f2c1e47adc11 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -3232,6 +3232,9 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int
> > o
Hi Mel,
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 03:13:40PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > The benefit is negligible and the results are within the noise but each
>> > cycle counts.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
>> > Cc: Vlastimil
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 03:13:40PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > The benefit is negligible and the results are within the noise but each
> > cycle counts.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman
> > Cc: Vlastimil Babka
> > Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> > Signed-off-by: An
eing unused kernel memory: 148K (003f7000 - 0041c000)
This architecture does not have kernel memory protection.
random: nonblocking pool is initialized
Detected scancode offset = 8 (key: 'left ctrl' with scancode $25)
Adding 137800k swap on /dev/hda2. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:137800
20 matches
Mail list logo
