On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 13:14 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
> Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 12:16 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
> >
> >> Dave,
> >>
> >> Apparently there appears to be another different similar lockup,
> >> The MTBF has risen from 1-2 hours without that patch to >100 hours
Dave Kleikamp wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 12:16 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
Dave,
Apparently there appears to be another different similar lockup,
The MTBF has risen from 1-2 hours without that patch to >100 hours,
so I am fairly sure the patch did correct the original lockup, or
at the very l
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 12:16 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
> Dave,
>
> Apparently there appears to be another different similar lockup,
> The MTBF has risen from 1-2 hours without that patch to >100 hours,
> so I am fairly sure the patch did correct the original lockup, or
> at the very least make it
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 09:37 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
> Dave Kleikamp wrote:
>
> >
> > I don't have an answer to an ext3 deadlock, but this looks like a jfs
> > problem that was recently fixed in linux-2.6.22-rc1. I had intended to
> > send it to the stable kernel after it was picked up in main
Dave Kleikamp wrote:
I don't have an answer to an ext3 deadlock, but this looks like a jfs
problem that was recently fixed in linux-2.6.22-rc1. I had intended to
send it to the stable kernel after it was picked up in mainline, but
hadn't gotten to it yet.
The patch is here:
http://git.kernel.
Dave Kleikamp wrote:
Sorry if I'm missing anyone on the reply, but my mail feed is messed up
and I'm replying from the gmane archive.
On Tue, 15 May 2007 09:08:25 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
Hello,
Running 2.6.21.1 (FC6 Dist), with a RHEL client (client
appears to not be having issues) I am ge
6 matches
Mail list logo
