On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Alan, could you delegate any of this work? Is it feasible to
> > have you redirect some portion of the patch analysis and acceptance
> > load to another person, other than Linus? Obviously, if the rate
>
> To be honest I get very little patch material I
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 09:44:07PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> I really would wish folks would not choose Alan as the first place
> to send the patch. I'm not directly accusing anyone of it, but it
> does appear that often AC is used as a "back door" to get a change
> in. While this scheme m
> Alan, could you delegate any of this work? Is it feasible to
> have you redirect some portion of the patch analysis and acceptance
> load to another person, other than Linus? Obviously, if the rate
To be honest I get very little patch material I didnt want to track. I get
lots of patches that
> I really would wish folks would not choose Alan as the first place
> to send the patch. I'm not directly accusing anyone of it, but it
I asked him about it on irc and why it was needed, so it sort of makes a lot
of sense he emailed me it 8)
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the l
On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
> My main point is that for changes like this, sending stuff to Alan
> first is often an ineffective mechanism. If someone were to reply to
> this "Linus is hard to push changes too, or takes too long" my reply
> is "if this is really the problem, sh
On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> Russell King writes:
> > There are various options here:
> >
> > 1. Either I can fix up all architectures, and send a patch to this list, or
>
> Fixup all the architectures and send this and the ARM bits to Linus.
>
> I really would wish folks wo
Russell King writes:
> There are various options here:
>
> 1. Either I can fix up all architectures, and send a patch to this list, or
Fixup all the architectures and send this and the ARM bits to Linus.
I really would wish folks would not choose Alan as the first place
to send the patch.
Hi,
For ARM, I require pgd_alloc to take a struct mm_struct argument (so the
pgd_alloc prototype becomes "pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *)".
Why? Because ARM must always have the first virtual page allocated and
present - its used for the hardware vectors, and in order to allocate
the page
8 matches
Mail list logo
