Re: Adding just a pinch of icache/dcache pressure...

2001-03-23 Thread Jan Harkes
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 05:17:16PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 05:10:56PM +0100, Jan Harkes wrote: > > btw. There definitely is a network receive buffer leak somewhere in > > either the 3c905C path or higher up in the network layers (2.4.0 or > > 2.4.1). The normal path does

Re: Adding just a pinch of icache/dcache pressure...

2001-03-23 Thread Andi Kleen
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 05:10:56PM +0100, Jan Harkes wrote: > btw. There definitely is a network receive buffer leak somewhere in > either the 3c905C path or higher up in the network layers (2.4.0 or > 2.4.1). The normal path does not leak anything. What do you mean with "normal path" ? And ar

Adding just a pinch of icache/dcache pressure...

2001-03-23 Thread Jan Harkes
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 10:13:55AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Personally I think the OOM killer itself is fine. I think there are > problems elsewhere which are triggering the OOM killer when it should > not be triggered, ie. a leak like Doug Ledford was reporting. > > I definitely see heavier