Re: AW: Linux kernel modules development in C++

2000-09-30 Thread Johan Kullstam
Carsten Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > i don't want to start discussing the pros and cons of using C++ in kernel > development. > BUT: why do we blame people if they want to? several reasons 1) this thread keeps coming back on linux-kernel and various linux related usenet groups

Re: AW: Linux kernel modules development in C++

2000-09-29 Thread Horst von Brand
Carsten Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > i don't want to start discussing the pros and cons of using C++ in kernel > development. Right. > BUT: why do we blame people if they want to? Just because. > It is possible to produce stable and good C++ modules (i have one for a > framegrabber devic

Re: AW: Linux kernel modules development in C++

2000-09-29 Thread Jes Sorensen
> "Carsten" == Carsten Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Carsten> Hi, i don't want to start discussing the pros and cons of Carsten> using C++ in kernel development. BUT: why do we blame people Carsten> if they want to? This is already covered in the 200 previous discussions about this - bas

AW: Linux kernel modules development in C++

2000-09-29 Thread Carsten Lang
Hi, i don't want to start discussing the pros and cons of using C++ in kernel development. BUT: why do we blame people if they want to? It is possible to produce stable and good C++ modules (i have one for a framegrabber device) and it is much easier to port already exsiting C++ drivers from w