On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 03:15:10PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
> >
> > OTOH, if i would write it this way
> >
> > #define BALIGN(x,bits) x) >> (bits)) + 1) << (bits))
>
> But that's *wrong*. It aligns something that is *already* aligned t
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
>
> OTOH, if i would write it this way
>
> #define BALIGN(x,bits) x) >> (bits)) + 1) << (bits))
But that's *wrong*. It aligns something that is *already* aligned to
something else.
So you'd have to do it as something like
#define ALIG
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 08:38:27AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
> >
> > Probably it can be used to get rid of gccisms and "type fluff" due to
> > bitwise arithmetics in ALIGN?
>
> Hell no.
>
> The typeof is there to make sure we have the right type,
3 matches
Mail list logo
