Re: 4.7-rc6, ext4, sparc64: Unable to handle kernel paging request at ...

2016-07-31 Thread Meelis Roos
> Just got this on bootup of my Sun T2000: This time I got similar (but with slightly different virtual address) one on the same t2000 on 4.7.0-07753-gc9b95e5. Looks like pointer corruption? [ 70.888080] This architecture does not have kernel memory protection. [ 70.901299] random: fast ini

Re: 4.7-rc6, ext4, sparc64: Unable to handle kernel paging request at ...

2016-07-10 Thread Mikael Pettersson
Meelis Roos writes: > > > Just got this on bootup of my Sun T2000: > > >... > > > I have not seen it before, this includes 4.6.0 4.6.0-08907-g7639dad > > > 4.7.0-rc1-00094-g6b15d66 4.7.0-rc4-00014-g67016f6. > > > > > > It is not reproducible, did not appear on next reboot of the same > > > k

Re: 4.7-rc6, ext4, sparc64: Unable to handle kernel paging request at ...

2016-07-04 Thread Meelis Roos
> > Just got this on bootup of my Sun T2000: > >... > > I have not seen it before, this includes 4.6.0 4.6.0-08907-g7639dad > > 4.7.0-rc1-00094-g6b15d66 4.7.0-rc4-00014-g67016f6. > > > > It is not reproducible, did not appear on next reboot of the same > > kernel. > > mine T5120 boots ok 4.7.0-rc6

Re: 4.7-rc6, ext4, sparc64: Unable to handle kernel paging request at ...

2016-07-04 Thread Anatoly Pugachev
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Meelis Roos wrote: > Just got this on bootup of my Sun T2000: >... > I have not seen it before, this includes 4.6.0 4.6.0-08907-g7639dad > 4.7.0-rc1-00094-g6b15d66 4.7.0-rc4-00014-g67016f6. > > It is not reproducible, did not appear on next reboot of the same > kern

4.7-rc6, ext4, sparc64: Unable to handle kernel paging request at ...

2016-07-04 Thread Meelis Roos
Just got this on bootup of my Sun T2000: [ 72.333077] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fcdf6000 [ 72.14] tsk->{mm,active_mm}->context = 00ba [ 72.333517] tsk->{mm,active_mm}->pgd = 8003f3518000 [ 72.333730] \|/ \|/