On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 11:25:43AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
> can you try turning off the "management enable" function in the BIOS of the
> DQ965GF? That fixes this issue for us in our labs. A fix for this is also
> available in our standalone 7.5.5.1 driver (obtainable from e1000.sf.net),
> but
Michel Lespinasse wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:14:52AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
I just checked and the fix I was referring to earlier didn't make it into
2.6.21-final. You can get 2.6.21-git1 from kernel.org which has the fix. See
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/patch
se
Cc: Kok, Auke-jan H; Chuck Ebbert; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Dave
Jones; cramerj; Ronciak, John; Brandeburg, Jesse; Kirsher, Jeffrey T;
Allan, Bruce W
Subject: Re: e1000 issue on DQ965GF board (was 24 lost ticks with
2.6.20.10 kernel)
[Adding Bruce to the Cc, reply below]
Michel Lespinasse
[Adding Bruce to the Cc, reply below]
Michel Lespinasse wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:14:52AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
I just checked and the fix I was referring to earlier didn't make it into
2.6.21-final. You can get 2.6.21-git1 from kernel.org which has the fix. See
http://www.kernel.or
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:14:52AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
> I just checked and the fix I was referring to earlier didn't make it into
> 2.6.21-final. You can get 2.6.21-git1 from kernel.org which has the fix. See
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/patch-2.6.21-git1.log
Go
Michel Lespinasse wrote:
I've had good results with 2.6.21.1 (even running tickless :)) on these
NICs. Have you tried that yet?
Not yet. Coming up... I'd prefer not to rely on new kernels at this
point though - but I can certainly try it just to report on current status.
I just checked and th
Michel Lespinasse wrote:
On my system, every e1000_watchdog() invocation calls e1000_read_phy_reg()
twice: first near the top of e1000_check_for_link() within the
e1000_media_type_copper && hw->get_link_status condition, then within
e1000_update_stats() to read and update the idle_errors statisti
Michel Lespinasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> running with report_lost_ticks, I see the following:
>
> May 1 12:58:57 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip
> _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x9)
> May 1 12:58:59 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip
> _spin_unlock_irqr
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 03:08:48PM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
> Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> >(I've added the E1000 maintainers to the thread as I found the issue
> >seems to go away after I compile out that driver. For reference, I was
> >trying to figure out why I lose exactly 24 ticks about every two
On 5/1/07, Kok, Auke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> (I've added the E1000 maintainers to the thread as I found the issue
> seems to go away after I compile out that driver. For reference, I was
> trying to figure out why I lose exactly 24 ticks about every two
> seconds, as
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Kok, Auke wrote:
Michel Lespinasse wrote:
(I've added the E1000 maintainers to the thread as I found the issue
seems to go away after I compile out that driver. For reference, I was
trying to figure out why I lose exactly 24 ticks about every two
seconds, as shown with repor
Kok, Auke wrote:
> Michel Lespinasse wrote:
>> (I've added the E1000 maintainers to the thread as I found the issue
>> seems to go away after I compile out that driver. For reference, I was
>> trying to figure out why I lose exactly 24 ticks about every two
>> seconds, as shown with report_lost_tic
Michel Lespinasse wrote:
(I've added the E1000 maintainers to the thread as I found the issue
seems to go away after I compile out that driver. For reference, I was
trying to figure out why I lose exactly 24 ticks about every two
seconds, as shown with report_lost_ticks. This is with a DQ965GF
mo
(I've added the E1000 maintainers to the thread as I found the issue
seems to go away after I compile out that driver. For reference, I was
trying to figure out why I lose exactly 24 ticks about every two
seconds, as shown with report_lost_ticks. This is with a DQ965GF
motherboard with onboard E100
Michel Lespinasse wrote:
>
> I'm having an issue with lost ticks, runnign linux 2.6.20.10 on an
> intel DQ965GF motherboard. For some reason this occurs with clock-like
> regularity, always exactly 24 lost ticks, about every two seconds.
> This is running with 250-HZ ticks, and the small pause eve
Hi,
Sorry if this is known, I am not on the list.
I'm having an issue with lost ticks, runnign linux 2.6.20.10 on an
intel DQ965GF motherboard. For some reason this occurs with clock-like
regularity, always exactly 24 lost ticks, about every two seconds.
This is running with 250-HZ ticks, and the
16 matches
Mail list logo
