On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:21:33 +0100 Thomas Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:21:29 -0800,
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a __crit :
>
> > ug, sorry, if I'd realised it was like this I'd have said "don't
> > bother". Apart from the obvious problem, this means that p
Le Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:21:29 -0800,
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> ug, sorry, if I'd realised it was like this I'd have said "don't
> bother". Apart from the obvious problem, this means that people will
> keep breaking CONFIG_DMI=n all the time, because they will forget the
> ifdefs
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:55:02 +0100 Thomas Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:13:40 -0800,
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a __crit :
>
> > Option 3 wold be to add more #ifdef CONFIG_DMI lines around the
> > place. How ugly would that get?
>
> Like the attached pat
Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
Le Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:41:47 -0800,
Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
Does this patch apply to -mm? Seem like No.
No, it was generated against 2.6.25-rc2.
After converting it from mime(?) to ASCII
Probably due to my PGP-MIME signature. Will try to remembe
Le Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:41:47 -0800,
Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Does this patch apply to -mm? Seem like No.
No, it was generated against 2.6.25-rc2.
> After converting it from mime(?) to ASCII
Probably due to my PGP-MIME signature. Will try to remember that
I should disable it
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:55:02 +0100 Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Le Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:13:40 -0800,
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> > Option 3 wold be to add more #ifdef CONFIG_DMI lines around the
> > place. How ugly would that get?
>
> Like the attached patch. #ifdef CONFIG_DMI
Le Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:13:40 -0800,
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Option 3 wold be to add more #ifdef CONFIG_DMI lines around the
> place. How ugly would that get?
Like the attached patch. #ifdef CONFIG_DMI everywhere :-(
Sincerly,
Thomas
---
Turn CONFIG_DMI into a selectable
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:15:36 +0100 Thomas Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:44:10 -0800,
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a __crit :
>
> > Bustage in x86-configurable-dmi-scanning-code.patch. Previously,
> > DMI=y was just hardwired. Now, it becomes selec
Hi,
Le Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:44:10 -0800,
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Bustage in x86-configurable-dmi-scanning-code.patch. Previously,
> DMI=y was just hardwired. Now, it becomes selectable and stuff
> breaks.
>
> I guess the DMI=n version of dmi_check_system() could become a m
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:16:03 -0800 Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:25:22 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc2/2.6.25-rc2-mm1/
>
> ACPI is enabled, but DMI=n.
>
> linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/drive
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:25:22 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc2/2.6.25-rc2-mm1/
ACPI is enabled, but DMI=n.
linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/drivers/acpi/thermal.c: In function 'acpi_thermal_init':
linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/drivers/acpi/therma
11 matches
Mail list logo
