On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:24:53 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > question: can we please list the last known good version for each
> > entry? Since these are all regressions (right?) that information
> > ought to be available and usually helps down in narrowing causes..
>
* Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, my definition of a regression from 2.6.24 is that it happens
> when someone takes a .config that worked with 2.6.24, configures the
> kernel with that, leaving the defaults for the options he is _asked_
> _for_, and the resulting kernel do
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:27:27 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday, 18 of February 2008, Carlos Eduardo Medaglia Dyonisio wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:03:59 +0100
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/sh
On Monday, 18 of February 2008, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9982
> > Subject : 2.6.25-rc1 panics on boot
> > Submitter : Dhaval Giani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2008-02-13 18:03
> > References : http://lkml.org/l
On Monday, 18 of February 2008, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 02/18/2008 10:49 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Why on earth do we have CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED at all if the only
> >> sane choice for someone who tests new kernels is to always turn it on?
>
On Monday, 18 of February 2008, Carlos Eduardo Medaglia Dyonisio wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:03:59 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9960
> > Subject : [2.6.25-rc0 System no longer powers off after
On Monday, 18 of February 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:03:59 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [This is a bit late, for which I'm sorry, but I waited for things to
> > calm down a bit, to have something less of a moving target.
> >
> > Now, fol
On 2/18/08, Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 02/18/2008 10:49 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Why on earth do we have CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED at all if the only
> >> sane choice for someone who tests new kernels is to always turn it on?
> >
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9982
> Subject : 2.6.25-rc1 panics on boot
> Submitter : Dhaval Giani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date : 2008-02-13 18:03
> References: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/13/363
> Handled-By: Chris Snook <[EMAIL PROT
On 02/18/2008 10:49 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why on earth do we have CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED at all if the only
sane choice for someone who tests new kernels is to always turn it on?
seconded ...
it's insane how inconvenient certain storage systems
* Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why on earth do we have CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED at all if the only
> sane choice for someone who tests new kernels is to always turn it on?
seconded ...
it's insane how inconvenient certain storage systems are to use, and
people get turned away w
On 2/18/08, Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 02/17/2008 11:03 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10021
> > Subject : Linux 2.6.25-rc2 regression: LVM cannot find volume
> > group
> > Submitter : Tilman Schmidt <[EMAIL P
On 02/17/2008 11:03 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10021
Subject : Linux 2.6.25-rc2 regression: LVM cannot find volume group
Submitter : Tilman Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2008-02-16 20:14
References :
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:03:59 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9960
> Subject : [2.6.25-rc0 System no longer powers off after shutdown
> Submitter : Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date : 200
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:03:59 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [This is a bit late, for which I'm sorry, but I waited for things to
> calm down a bit, to have something less of a moving target.
>
> Now, following an Ingo's advice, the list has been generated directly
> out of
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10002
> Subject : wpa_supplicant doens't work and froze the computer
> Submitter : François Valenduc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date : 2008-02-16 08:25
>
[...]
> Bug-Entry : http://bugz
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 12:06:41AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 17 of February 2008, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9842
> > > Subject : key 49 and 94 send both 49 and 9
On Sunday, 17 of February 2008, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9842
> > Subject : key 49 and 94 send both 49 and 94 events on macbooks
> > REGRESSION
> > Submitter : Emil Karlson <[EMA
Hello,
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9984
> > Subject : problem with starting 2.5.25-rc1 and latest git
>
> The kernel version seems to be a little bit bogus here :)
That's a typo :/ Should read 2.6.25-rc1 instead.
Mariusz
--
To unsubscribe fro
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9842
> Subject : key 49 and 94 send both 49 and 94 events on macbooks
> REGRESSION
> Submitter : Emil Karlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date : 2008-01-29 08:15
I have
[This is a bit late, for which I'm sorry, but I waited for things to calm down
a bit, to have something less of a moving target.
Now, following an Ingo's advice, the list has been generated directly out of
the Bugzilla entries used for tracking the bugs. I'm going to release the
script used for g
21 matches
Mail list logo
