On Tuesday, 20 of November 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > increasing CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE from to 131072 hasn't
> > > changed the non-functioning of 2.6.24-rc3
> > >
> > > s2disk works with 2.6.23.8 ; I tested 4 cycles in a row, 2 fro
The patch
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13652&action=view from
Comment #16 of http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9345
also works for me and enables successful s2disk cycles.
Tested with 6 cycles, 3 from console and than 3 from within X.
Thanks,
Chris
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 0
the patch on top of 2.6.24-rc3 fixed the problem.
now I can succesfully s2disk.
I tested it 5 times in a row, 2 from the console and 3 from within X
thanks for fixing it,
Chris
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:58:29 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday, 19 of November 2007, Ch
* Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > increasing CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE from to 131072 hasn't
> > changed the non-functioning of 2.6.24-rc3
> >
> > s2disk works with 2.6.23.8 ; I tested 4 cycles in a row, 2 from
> > console and 2 from within X
>
> I've attached a patch to t
On Monday, 19 of November 2007, Chris Friedhoff wrote:
> dmesg output is added.
>
> increasing CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE from to 131072 hasn't changed
> the non-functioning of 2.6.24-rc3
>
> s2disk works with 2.6.23.8 ; I tested 4 cycles in a row, 2 from console
> and 2 from within X
I've att
dmesg output is added.
increasing CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE from to 131072 hasn't changed
the non-functioning of 2.6.24-rc3
s2disk works with 2.6.23.8 ; I tested 4 cycles in a row, 2 from console
and 2 from within X
Chris
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:58:36 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTE
On Monday, 19 of November 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 19 of November 2007, Chris Friedhoff wrote:
> > Hallo Rafael,
> >
> > just to let you know: with 2.6.24-rc3 I have the same problem.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:45:06 +0100
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Monday, 19 of November 2007, Chris Friedhoff wrote:
> Hallo Rafael,
>
> just to let you know: with 2.6.24-rc3 I have the same problem.
Thanks.
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:45:06 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Saturday, 10 of November 2007, Chris Friedhoff wrote:
Hallo Rafael,
just to let you know: with 2.6.24-rc3 I have the same problem.
Chris
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:45:06 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday, 10 of November 2007, Chris Friedhoff wrote:
> > please cc me, I'm not not subscribed to LKML
> >
> > Hello,
> >
kernel config attached to comment#2 for bugreport 9345
s2disk comes from suspend-0.7 package
Thanks,
Chris
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:45:06 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday, 10 of November 2007, Chris Friedhoff wrote:
> > please cc me, I'm not not subscribed to LKML
On Saturday, 10 of November 2007, Chris Friedhoff wrote:
> please cc me, I'm not not subscribed to LKML
>
> Hello,
>
> with kernel 2.6.24-rc2 STD with s2disk suspends the system to disk, but
> when I start the system and the suspended systemimage is loaded, it
> fails to "activate" this suspended
please cc me, I'm not not subscribed to LKML
Hello,
with kernel 2.6.24-rc2 STD with s2disk suspends the system to disk, but
when I start the system and the suspended systemimage is loaded, it
fails to "activate" this suspended systemimage and continues after some
time with following the normal bo
12 matches
Mail list logo
