On 11/14, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 06:17:08PM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > Suppose that old user_struct/task_group is freed/reused, and the task does
>
> Shouldn't this old user actually be the root user_struct?
Well, the S_ISUID application can switch ->user from
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 06:17:08PM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Suppose that old user_struct/task_group is freed/reused, and the task does
Shouldn't this old user actually be the root user_struct?
--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
btw., could you get your Signed-off-by line for that fix?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.
* Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I suspect I see the bug in that area, but I am not sure it can
> > > explain this trace completely.
> >
> > there's a fix pending from Dmitry - please see below. It took days
> > for Grant to trigger the crash so it needs some time to be confirm
On 11/14, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > [18073.371126] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> > > 0120 RIP:
> > > [18073.371134] [] check_preempt_wakeup+0x6e/0x110
> > > [18073.371144] PGD 81f9067 PUD 81c8067 PMD 0
> > > [18
* Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [18073.371126] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> > 0120 RIP:
> > [18073.371134] [] check_preempt_wakeup+0x6e/0x110
> > [18073.371144] PGD 81f9067 PUD 81c8067 PMD 0
> > [18073.371151] Oops: [1] PREEMPT SMP
> > [1
Grant Wilson wrote:
>
> [18073.371126] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> 0120 RIP:
> [18073.371134] [] check_preempt_wakeup+0x6e/0x110
> [18073.371144] PGD 81f9067 PUD 81c8067 PMD 0
> [18073.371151] Oops: [1] PREEMPT SMP
> [18073.371157] CPU 2
> [18073.371161]
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:05:49 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 23:49 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 22:42:21 +0100
> > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 23:49 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 22:42:21 +0100
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 16:
On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 22:42:21 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 16:53:10 +0100
> > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
>
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 22:42:21 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 16:53:10 +0100
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote:
> > > > O
On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 16:53:10 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 01:06:21 +0100
> > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
>
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 16:53:10 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 01:06:21 +0100
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Monday, 5 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote:
> > > > Hi,
On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 01:06:21 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Monday, 5 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I got this oops on 2.6.24-rc1-641-gb4f5550:
> >
> > (1) Is this reproducible?
> > (2)
On Monday, 5 of November 2007, Grant Wilson wrote:
> Hi,
> I got this oops on 2.6.24-rc1-641-gb4f5550:
(1) Is this reproducible?
(2) Did it happen previously on your system?
> [18073.371126] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> 0120 RIP:
> [18073.371134] [] check_
Hi,
I got this oops on 2.6.24-rc1-641-gb4f5550:
[18073.371126] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
0120 RIP:
[18073.371134] [] check_preempt_wakeup+0x6e/0x110
[18073.371144] PGD 81f9067 PUD 81c8067 PMD 0
[18073.371151] Oops: [1] PREEMPT SMP
[18073.371157] CPU
16 matches
Mail list logo