* Martin Knoblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of the reasons I do 15 GB transfers is to make sure that I am
> well above the possible page cache size. And of course I am doing a
> final sync to finish the runs :-) The sync is also running faster in
> 2.6.24-rc1.
>
> If I factor it
07 9:33:40 PM
> Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc1: First impressions
>
>
> * Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > > dd1 - copy 16 GB from /dev/zero to local FS
> > > > dd1-dir - same, but using O_DIRECT for output
> > > > dd2/dd2-dir - copy 2x7.6 GB in pa
EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 7:59:51 AM
> Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc1: First impressions
>
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:46:57 -0700 Arjan van de
> Ven
>
wrote:
>
> > > > > dd1 - copy 16 GB from /dev/zero to local FS
> > > > > dd
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:33:40 +0200
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so a final 'sync' should be added to the test too, and the time it takes
factored into the bandwidth numbers?
That's one way of doing it. Or just run
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:46:57 -0700 Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > dd1 - copy 16 GB from /dev/zero to local FS
> > > > dd1-dir - same, but using O_DIRECT for output
> > > > dd2/dd2-dir - copy 2x7.6 GB in parallel from /dev/zero to local FS
> > > > dd3/dd3-dir - copy 3x5.2 GB in
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:21:55 -0700
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:22:21 +0200
> Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > * Martin Knoblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi ,
> > >
> > > just to give some feedback on 2.6.24-rc1. For some time
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:33:40 +0200
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > dd1 - copy 16 GB from /dev/zero to local FS
> > > > dd1-dir - same, but using O_DIRECT for output
> > > > dd2/dd2-dir - copy 2x7.6 GB in parallel from /dev/zero to l
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > dd1 - copy 16 GB from /dev/zero to local FS
> > > dd1-dir - same, but using O_DIRECT for output
> > > dd2/dd2-dir - copy 2x7.6 GB in parallel from /dev/zero to local FS
> > > dd3/dd3-dir - copy 3x5.2 GB in parallel from /dev/zero lo local FS
> > >
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:22:21 +0200
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Martin Knoblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi ,
> >
> > just to give some feedback on 2.6.24-rc1. For some time I am tracking
> > IO/writeback problems that hurt system responsiveness big-time. I
> > tes
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:29:00 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > wow, really nice results! Peter does know how to make stuff fast :)
> > Now lets pick up some of Peter's other, previously discarded
> > patches as well :-)
> >
> > Such as the rewritten reclaim (clockpro) patches:
>
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 17:22 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Martin Knoblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi ,
> >
> > just to give some feedback on 2.6.24-rc1. For some time I am tracking
> > IO/writeback problems that hurt system responsiveness big-time. I
> > tested Peters stuff togethe
* Martin Knoblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> just to give some feedback on 2.6.24-rc1. For some time I am tracking
> IO/writeback problems that hurt system responsiveness big-time. I
> tested Peters stuff together with Fenguangs additions and it looked
> promising. Therefore I
Hi ,
just to give some feedback on 2.6.24-rc1. For some time I am tracking
IO/writeback problems that hurt system responsiveness big-time. I tested Peters
stuff together with Fenguangs additions and it looked promising. Therefore I
was very happy to see Peters stuff going into 2.6.24 and waite
13 matches
Mail list logo
