Re: NETPOLL=y , NETDEVICES=n compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-08-03 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:59:23AM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:00:08AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:02:19PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: ... > > > How about cc:ing the netpoll maintainer? > > > > Is there a new one or do you suggest possibi

Re: [PATCH] 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - fix missing numa_zonelist_order sysctl

2007-08-02 Thread KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 11:07:38 -0400 Lee Schermerhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Of course, I don't have any idea of what is a "reasonable amount". > Guess I could look at non-movable zone memory usage in a system at > typical or peak load to get an idea. Anyone have any data in this > regard? >

Re: [PATCH] 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - fix missing numa_zonelist_order sysctl

2007-08-02 Thread Mel Gorman
On (02/08/07 17:14), Mel Gorman didst pronounce: > On (02/08/07 09:44), KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki didst pronounce: > > On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:02:51 -0400 > > Lee Schermerhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea > > > when ZONE_MOVABLE is populated?]

Re: [PATCH] 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - fix missing numa_zonelist_order sysctl

2007-08-02 Thread Mel Gorman
On (02/08/07 09:44), KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki didst pronounce: > On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:02:51 -0400 > Lee Schermerhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea > > when ZONE_MOVABLE is populated?] > > > > It's case-by-case I think. In zone order with ZO

Re: NETPOLL=y , NETDEVICES=n compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-08-02 Thread Matt Mackall
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:00:08AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:02:19PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:59:21AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:05:00PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote: > > > > Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > >

Re: [PATCH] 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - fix missing numa_zonelist_order sysctl

2007-08-02 Thread Lee Schermerhorn
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 09:44 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:02:51 -0400 > Lee Schermerhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea > > when ZONE_MOVABLE is populated?] > > > > It's case-by-case I think. In zone order wit

Re: NETPOLL=y , NETDEVICES=n compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-08-02 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 05:26:12PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: ... > Whoops, I only said that in humour, probably should've snuck in a > smiley or two. Definitely not blaming anybody. Apologies to anyone > who felt offended, sorry, nothing such was intended, I assure. I see you probably didn't not

Re: NETPOLL=y , NETDEVICES=n compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-08-02 Thread Satyam Sharma
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 04:02:21PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > [...] > How often "common" developer has to make such decisions in Kconfig? > Probably no more than once per year. So, it's fair to blame anybody > for not reading lkml to find if there

Re: NETPOLL=y , NETDEVICES=n compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-08-02 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 04:02:21PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > Hi, > > > On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > endif # NETDEVICES > > > > > > > > config NETPOLL > > > > depends on NETDEVICES > > > > def_bool NETCONSOLE > > > > > > > > config N

Re: NETPOLL=y , NETDEVICES=n compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-08-02 Thread Satyam Sharma
pends on NETPOLL > > > > > > > > config NET_POLL_CONTROLLER > > > > def_bool NETPOLL > > > > depends on NETPOLL Gargh, what we're seeing here is a whole bunch of bugs, I think. First I thought this must be one of those randc

Re: NETPOLL=y , NETDEVICES=n compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-08-02 Thread Satyam Sharma
Hi, On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > > > ... > > > endif # NETDEVICES > > > > > > config NETPOLL > > > depends on NETDEVICES > > > def_bool NETCONSOLE > > > > > > config NETPOLL_TRAP > > > bool "Netpoll traffic trapping" > > > default n > > >

Re: NETPOLL=y , NETDEVICES=n compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-08-02 Thread Sam Ravnborg
> > > > ... > > endif # NETDEVICES > > > > config NETPOLL > > depends on NETDEVICES > > def_bool NETCONSOLE > > > > config NETPOLL_TRAP > > bool "Netpoll traffic trapping" > > default n > > depends on NETPOLL > > > > config NET_POLL_CONTROLLER > >

Re: NETPOLL=y , NETDEVICES=n compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-08-02 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:02:19PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:59:21AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:05:00PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote: > > > Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote: > > > >> Ja

Re: NETPOLL=y , NETDEVICES=n compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-08-01 Thread Matt Mackall
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:59:21AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:05:00PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote: > > Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote: > > >> Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > >>> On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote: > > >

Re: [PATCH] 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - fix missing numa_zonelist_order sysctl

2007-08-01 Thread KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:02:51 -0400 Lee Schermerhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea > when ZONE_MOVABLE is populated?] > It's case-by-case I think. In zone order with ZONE_MOVABLE case, user's page cache will not use ZONE_NORMAL until ZONE

[PATCH] 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - fix missing numa_zonelist_order sysctl

2007-08-01 Thread Lee Schermerhorn
Fix missing numa_zonelist_order sysctl config Against 2.6.23-rc1-mm1. Found this testing Mel Gorman's patch for the issue with "policy_zone" and ZONE_MOVABLE. Misplaced #endif is hiding the numa_zonelist_order sysctl when !SECURITY. [But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not s

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - loopback mount of files fails loop-use-unlocked_ioctl.patch

2007-08-01 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:03:04 PDT, Andrew Morton said: > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/ Looks like -rc1-mm2 came out while I was hunting this, haven't tried that yet) File-backed loopback seems to be broken (note that I use a LV

Re: NETPOLL=y , NETDEVICES=n compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-08-01 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:05:00PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote: > Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote: > >> Jarek Poplawski wrote: > >>> On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - seems OK on Dell Latitude D820, except for tpm_tis

2007-07-31 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Tuesday 31 July 2007 03:31:43 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:01:21 MDT, Bjorn Helgaas said: > > So, the BIOS is telling us that at least as currently configured, the > > TPM can't use interrupts. /sys/devices/pnp0/00:0f/options should have > > all the *possible* TPM config

2.6.23-rc1-mm1 Reiser4 / SLUB padding overwritten error

2007-07-31 Thread Zan Lynx
base netconsole usb_storage usbhid hid libusual snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss sg ipv6 evdev snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus psmouse snd_pcm ehci_hcd snd_timer serio_raw ohci_hcd snd snd_page_alloc usbcore Pid: 7793, comm: gnome-volume-ma Not tainted 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 #1 RIP:

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - seems OK on Dell Latitude D820, except for tpm_tis

2007-07-31 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:01:21 MDT, Bjorn Helgaas said: > So, the BIOS is telling us that at least as currently configured, the > TPM can't use interrupts. /sys/devices/pnp0/00:0f/options should have > all the *possible* TPM configurations. I would guess that none of them > shows an IRQ either. H

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - seems OK on Dell Latitude D820, except for tpm_tis

2007-07-31 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Tuesday 31 July 2007 12:48:29 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Scratch that. When I wrote the first note, I was at home, and the TPM chip > did its PNP thing and became 00:0e. I failed to notice that in my reply, > I was at work, and the printer port on the docking station became 00:0e and > the

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - seems OK on Dell Latitude D820, except for tpm_tis

2007-07-31 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:53:19 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > Just for the record, I see this in /sys: > > > > > > % cat /sys/bus/pnp/devices/00:0e/id > > > BCM0102 > > > PNP0c31 > > > > What's in /sys/bus/pnp/devices/00:0e/resources? > > % cat /sys/bus/pnp/devices/00:0e/resources > state = a

Re: NETPOLL=y , NETDEVICES=n compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-07-31 Thread Gabriel C
Jarek Poplawski wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote: >> Jarek Poplawski wrote: >>> On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I got this c

Re: NETPOLL=y , NETDEVICES=n compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-07-31 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 06:44:52AM -0500, Jason Wessel wrote: ... > kgdboe is completely useless without a network card that has a polling > driver. It seems to me that the simple and easy fix is to set it to > depend on NETDEVICES but allow it to use select on NETPOLL. Maybe I miss your point

Re: NETPOLL=y , NETDEVICES=n compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-07-31 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote: > Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote: > >> Andrew Morton wrote: > >>> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > Hi, > > I got this compile error with a randco

Re: NETPOLL=y , NETDEVICES=n compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-07-31 Thread Jason Wessel
Gabriel C wrote: Jarek Poplawski wrote: On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I got this compile error with a randconfig ( http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.b

Re: NETPOLL=y , NETDEVICES=n compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-07-31 Thread Gabriel C
Jarek Poplawski wrote: > On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote: >> Andrew Morton wrote: >>> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi, I got this compile error with a randconfig ( http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.broken.netpoll.c

Re: NETPOLL=y , NETDEVICES=n compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-07-31 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I got this compile error with a randconfig ( >>> http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.broken.netpoll.c ). >>> >>> ... >>> >>> net/core/

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-30 Thread Dave Young
>On 7/30/07, Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 11:27:20AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > ho hum, crap. Yes, ioctl_by_bdev() doesn't have a file* and so it makes > > > unlocked_ioctl() rather tricky. We cou

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - seems OK on Dell Latitude D820, except for tpm_tis

2007-07-30 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:43:13 MDT, Bjorn Helgaas said: > I don't know why tpm_tis_init() is messing around trying different > IRQs between 3 and 16. That looks suspiciously x86-dependent. > > Maybe if you don't have PNP (though I doubt TPMs exist on any > pre-PNPBIOS machines) the "check-IRQ" loo

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-30 Thread Satyam Sharma
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 11:27:20AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > ho hum, crap. Yes, ioctl_by_bdev() doesn't have a file* and so it makes > > unlocked_ioctl() rather tricky. We could cook up a `struct file' on the > > stack (we do that in variou

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-30 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 11:27:20AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > ho hum, crap. Yes, ioctl_by_bdev() doesn't have a file* and so it makes > unlocked_ioctl() rather tricky. We could cook up a `struct file' on the > stack (we do that in various places), but that sucks. > > Christoph, have you any c

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-30 Thread Andrew Morton
T SMP > > [ 85.718117] CPU 1 > > [ 85.720159] Modules linked in: > > [ 85.723242] Pid: 3976, comm: mount Not tainted 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 #4 > > [ 85.729247] RIP: 0010:[] [] > > lo_ioctl+0x25/0xaa0 > > [ 85.737011] RSP: 0018:8100076a3708 EFLAGS: 00010282 &

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - seems OK on Dell Latitude D820, except for tpm_tis

2007-07-30 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Friday 27 July 2007 04:43:13 pm Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Friday 27 July 2007 07:28:09 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Looks like the problematic code is in tpm_tis.c tpm_tis_init() near here: > > > > for (i = 3; i < 16 && chip->vendor.irq == 0; i++) { > >

Re: mm/sparse.c compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-07-30 Thread Andy Whitcroft
gt; make: *** [mm] Error 2 >> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs >> >> ... >> >> >> guessing while this patch , but I am not really sure : >> >> fix-corruption-of-memmap-on-ia64-sparsemem-when-mem_section-is-not-a-power-of-2.patch >> >

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-30 Thread Dave Young
; 0100 RIP: > [ 85.702528] [] lo_ioctl+0x25/0xaa0 > [ 85.710066] PGD 73fd067 PUD 735b067 PMD 0 > [ 85.714221] Oops: [1] PREEMPT SMP > [ 85.718117] CPU 1 > [ 85.720159] Modules linked in: > [ 85.723242] Pid: 3976, comm: mount Not tainted 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 #4

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected -- (&hashbin->hb_spinlock){....}, at: [] irias_seq_show+0xba/0x1a8

2007-07-29 Thread Paul Menage
On 7/28/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [] proc_cpuset_show+0x5e/0xb9 > > [] seq_read+0xef/0x266 > > [] vfs_read+0x8e/0x117 > > [] sys_read+0x3d/0x61 > > [] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99 > > === > > INFO: lockdep is turned off. > > Code: 00 89 d8 83 c4 0c 5b

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-29 Thread Grant Wilson
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:03:04 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/ > Hi, I get an oops when trying to mount an ISO file using the loopback device. If I revert the

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 compile error in function `acpi_pci_choose_state':

2007-07-29 Thread Gabriel C
to `acpi_pm_device_sleep_state' This patch should fix it : http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/hot-fixes/acpi-revert-d-states-branch-from-jun-17-to-jun-19-for-2623-rc1-mm1.patch - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe l

2.6.23-rc1-mm1 compile error in function `acpi_pci_choose_state':

2007-07-29 Thread Berck E. Nash
Config file attached. # # Automatically generated make config: don't edit # Linux kernel version: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 # Sun Jul 29 09:14:48 2007 # CONFIG_X86_64=y CONFIG_64BIT=y CONFIG_X86=y CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME=y CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL=y CONFIG_GENERIC_CMOS_UPDATE=y CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32=y

[POWERPC] 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 build failure

2007-07-29 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, iMac G3 series. $ make mrproper && make allmodconfig && make results in this: CC arch/powerpc/kernel/lparmap.s AS arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.o lparmap.c: Assembler messages: lparmap.c:84: Error: file number 1 already allocated make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/head

Re: NETPOLL=y , NETDEVICES=n compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-07-28 Thread Gabriel C
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I got this compile error with a randconfig ( >> http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.broken.netpoll.c ). >> >> ... >> >> net/core/netpoll.c: In function 'netpoll_poll': >> net/cor

Re: mm/sparse.c compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-07-28 Thread Andrew Morton
; ... > > > guessing while this patch , but I am not really sure : > > fix-corruption-of-memmap-on-ia64-sparsemem-when-mem_section-is-not-a-power-of-2.patch > That seems to have been fixed by one of the post-2.6.23-rc1-mm1 patches I merged, thanks. - To unsubscribe from this li

Re: NETPOLL=y , NETDEVICES=n compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-07-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:45 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I got this compile error with a randconfig ( > http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.broken.netpoll.c ). > > ... > > net/core/netpoll.c: In function 'netpoll_poll': > net/core/netpoll.c:155: error: 'struct

mm/sparse.c compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-07-28 Thread Gabriel C
Hi, next randconfig error ( http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-87.mm_sparse.error ) ... mm/sparse.c: In function 'sparse_init': mm/sparse.c:482: error: implicit declaration of function 'sparse_early_usemap_alloc' mm/sparse.c:482: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a

sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.h - declared 'static' but never defined warnings ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-07-28 Thread Gabriel C
... sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.h:86: warning: 'snd_ac97_restore_status' declared 'static' but never defined sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.h:87: warning: 'snd_ac97_restore_iec958' declared 'static' but never defined ... Got that with a randconfig ( http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-86.ioat

DCA=n , INTEL_IOATDMA=y compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-07-28 Thread Gabriel C
Hi, I got this error with a randconfig ( http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-86.ioat ) ... LD .tmp_vmlinux1 drivers/built-in.o: In function `ioat_shutdown_functionality': ioat.c:(.text+0x21ed32): undefined reference to `unregister_dca_provider' ioat.c:(.text+0x21ed3a): undefined re

NETPOLL=y , NETDEVICES=n compile error ( Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 )

2007-07-28 Thread Gabriel C
Hi, I got this compile error with a randconfig ( http://194.231.229.228/MM/randconfig-auto-82.broken.netpoll.c ). ... net/core/netpoll.c: In function 'netpoll_poll': net/core/netpoll.c:155: error: 'struct net_device' has no member named 'poll_controller' net/core/netpoll.c:159: error: 'struct

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-28 Thread Torsten Kaiser
36.932215] result 12500283 > [ 36.940581] Detected 12.500 MHz APIC timer. > > So I think, I will postpone SPARSEMEM until -mm2, as there are seem to > be some problems in that area (Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 sparsemem_vmemamp > fix) > > But maybee I will get SLUB to work. ;) SLUB

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected -- (&hashbin->hb_spinlock){....}, at: [] irias_seq_show+0xba/0x1a8

2007-07-28 Thread Andrew Morton
ot;[a-g]*" | xargs file > > dmesg shows: I'm unable to reproduce this. > process `cat' is using deprecated sysctl (syscall) > net.ipv6.neigh.default.retrans_time; Use > net.ipv6.neigh.default.retrans_time_ms instead. > > ============

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 + hotfixes -- Section mismatches

2007-07-27 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 10:16:35PM -0700, Miles Lane wrote: > MODPOST vmlinux.o > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x183): Section mismatch: reference to > .init.text.1:start_kernel (between 'is386' and 'check_x87') This one is not fixed - yet. The rest are fixed in latest -linus. modpost choked over t

2.6.23-rc1-mm1 + hotfixes -- Section mismatches

2007-07-27 Thread Miles Lane
MODPOST vmlinux.o WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x183): Section mismatch: reference to .init.text.1:start_kernel (between 'is386' and 'check_x87') WARNING: vmlinux.o(.data+0x53c0): Section mismatch: reference to .init.text.4:native_smp_prepare_boot_cpu (between 'smp_ops' and 'call_lock') WARNING: vmli

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - seems OK on Dell Latitude D820, except for tpm_tis

2007-07-27 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Friday 27 July 2007 07:28:09 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Looks like the problematic code is in tpm_tis.c tpm_tis_init() near here: > > for (i = 3; i < 16 && chip->vendor.irq == 0; i++) { > iowrite8(i, chip->vendor.iobase + >

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - seems OK on Dell Latitude D820, except for tpm_tis

2007-07-27 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:07:01 PDT, Andrew Morton said: > On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:28:09 -0400 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > And we have a winner. In my bisect 'hunt' file, I ended at: > > > > fs-use-kmem_cache_zalloc-instead.patch GOOD > > # remove-kconfig-setting-config_debug_shirq.patch: Ingo wo

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - seems OK on Dell Latitude D820, except for tpm_tis

2007-07-27 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:28:09 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:00:32 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > Apparently, things go pear-shaped in tis_tpm_send(), when they get to the > > 'if (chip->vendor.irq)' - under 22-rc6-mm1, we never got into this code, > > because earlier

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1: reiser4 <-> lzo compile error

2007-07-27 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 16:35 +0400, Edward Shishkin wrote: > Sorry, guys, I am not happy with the modified LZO: > the compressor tries to test bytes which are out of bounds. > > The attached module testlzo.c causes an oops in the second pass: > AFAIK, both, @m and @m_pos should be in [wrkmem, wrkme

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - seems OK on Dell Latitude D820, except for tpm_tis

2007-07-27 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:00:32 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Apparently, things go pear-shaped in tis_tpm_send(), when they get to the > 'if (chip->vendor.irq)' - under 22-rc6-mm1, we never got into this code, > because earlier initialization complained it couldn't get IRQ8. Now, we > get IRQ3, an

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1: reiser4 <-> lzo compile error

2007-07-27 Thread Edward Shishkin
K, both, @m and @m_pos should be in [wrkmem, wrkmem + 64K); I have attached trace.txt with their actual values. Not ready to migrate to this library. Any ideas? Thanks, Edward. P.S. kernel: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 box: x86 #include #include #include #include #include MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - seems OK on Dell Latitude D820, except for tpm_tis

2007-07-26 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
to track what it was doing, and got several tests in under 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 and 2.6.23-rc1-mm1. I've attached: debug.22-rc6-mm1 - things apparently working under the previous kernel. debug.rc1-a - this one complained but didn't time out for long times. I've

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-26 Thread Dave Hansen
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 17:07 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > > WARNING: Absolute relocations present > > > Offset Info Type Sym.Value Sym.Name > > > c0202e73 00703601 R_386_32 c03071bc _sdata > > > > > > $ grep c03071bc System.map > > > c03071bc R __tracedata_end > > > c03071bc A _sdata

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-26 Thread Torsten Kaiser
NIT_LIST_HEAD(struct list_head *list) > > > 31 { > > > 32 list->next = list; > > > 33 list->prev = list; > > > 34 } > > > 35 > > > 36 /* > > > > > > Torsten > > > &

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 -- mostly fails to build

2007-07-26 Thread Yinghai Lu
below: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address printing eip: c111689f *pdpt = 01387001 *pde = Oops: [#1] SMP Modules linked in: CPU:0 EIP:0060:[]Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00010286 (2.6.23-rc1-mm1-gc8131905-dirty #251

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 sparsemem_vmemamp fix.

2007-07-26 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Andy Whitcroft wrote: > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: >> Fix sparsemem_vmemmap init. sorry if known bug. >> >> This patch fixes page table handling in sparsemem_vmammap. >> >> Without this, part of vmem_map is not mapped because each section's start >> addr of >> mem_map is not aligned to PGD/PMD/PUD.

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 sparsemem_vmemamp fix.

2007-07-26 Thread Andy Whitcroft
n the hierachy. This seems like a clean way to fix the bug. Thanks for finding this. Acked-by: Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > --- > mm/sparse.c | 24 +++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > Index: devel-2.6.2

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-26 Thread Cedric Le Goater
Mel Gorman wrote: > On (25/07/07 19:26), Len Brown didst pronounce: >> On Wednesday 25 July 2007 14:58, Andrew Morton wrote: >>> On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:23:04 -0400 >>> Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Andrew, you want to re-pull the acpi tree, or do you want me to send you some pa

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 sparsemem_vmemamp fix.

2007-07-26 Thread KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) Index: devel-2.6.23-rc1-mm1/mm/sparse.c === --- devel-2.6.23-rc1-mm1.orig/mm/sparse.c +++ devel-2.6.23-rc1-mm1/mm/sparse.c @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static int __meminit vmemmap_populate_pt

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1: SCSI_SRP_ATTRS compile error

2007-07-26 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1: SCSI_SRP_ATTRS compile error Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:06:18 +0200 > On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 05:36:56PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > > Of the machines we test releases on automatically this only compiles on > >

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-26 Thread Mel Gorman
On (25/07/07 19:26), Len Brown didst pronounce: > On Wednesday 25 July 2007 14:58, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:23:04 -0400 > > Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Andrew, you want to re-pull the acpi tree, or do you want me to send > > > you some patches on top of th

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-26 Thread Andrew Morton
{ > > > 32 list->next = list; > > > 33 list->prev = list; > > > 34 } > > > 35 > > > 36 /* > > > > > > Torsten > > > > Quite a few people have been playing in that area. Can you

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 -- mostly fails to build

2007-07-25 Thread Andrew Morton
ic below: > > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address > > printing eip: > c111689f > *pdpt = 01387001 > *pde = > Oops: [#1] > SMP > Modules linked in: > CPU: 0 > EIP: 0060:[]Not

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - drivers/char/nozomi.c overflow in implicit constant conversion , warnings

2007-07-25 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 10:42:07PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote: > > ... > > drivers/char/nozomi.c: In function 'interrupt_handler': > drivers/char/nozomi.c:1298: warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion > drivers/char/nozomi.c: In function 'nozomi_card_init': > drivers/char/nozomi.c:1568: war

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - seems OK on Dell Latitude D820, except for tpm_tis

2007-07-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:03:14 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:03:04 PDT, Andrew Morton said: > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/ > > It built and booted on the first try for my Dell Latitude

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-25 Thread Andrew Morton
ction `pnpacpi_suspend': > : undefined reference to `acpi_pm_device_sleep_state' > make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 > > The pci-acpi.c depends on CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP There's a hopeful-fix for this in ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-25 Thread Dave Young
Hi, drivers/built-in.o(.text+0xc649): In function `acpi_pci_choose_state': : undefined reference to `acpi_pm_device_sleep_state' drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x3fe08): In function `pnpacpi_suspend': : undefined reference to `acpi_pm_device_sleep_state' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 The pci-acpi.c

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1: git-kgdb breaks sh compilation

2007-07-25 Thread Paul Mundt
unction) drivers/serial/sh-sci.c:188: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once drivers/serial/sh-sci.c:188: error: for each function it appears in.) make[3]: *** [drivers/serial/sh-sci.o] Error 1 Reported-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <[E

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:07:05 -0700 Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Guessing is this patch ? > > > > gregkh-driver-warn-when-statically-allocated-kobjects-are-used.patch: > > __tracedata_end = .; > > gregkh-driver-warn-when-statically-allocated-kobjects-are-used.patch:+ > > _sd

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-25 Thread Greg KH
TECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/ > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> Andi, this might be interesting for you > >>>> > >>>> make all

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-25 Thread Len Brown
560b6d0649 Author: Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed Jul 25 19:17:38 2007 -0400 ACPI: revert d-states branch from Jun-17 to Jun-19 for 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 Signed-off-by: Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c | 75

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1: chipsfb_pci_suspend problem

2007-07-25 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/ > > > > > > from pm-move-definition-of-struct-pm_ops-to-suspendh.patch : > > > > > > drivers/video/chipsfb.c: In function 'chipsfb_p

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 -- mostly fails to build

2007-07-25 Thread Andy Whitcroft
c111689f *pdpt = 01387001 *pde = Oops: [#1] SMP Modules linked in: CPU:0 EIP:0060:[]Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00010286 (2.6.23-rc1-mm1-gc8131905-dirty #251) EIP is at pci_create_bus+0x11b/0x277 eax: ebx: c9352e00 ecx: c9073e94 edx: c932

2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - seems OK on Dell Latitude D820, except for tpm_tis

2007-07-25 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:03:04 PDT, Andrew Morton said: > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/ It built and booted on the first try for my Dell Latitude D820 laptop, Core2 T7200 x86_64 kernel. Now at about 5 hours of uptime. I guess I got lu

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:32:58 +0200 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Morton pisze: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/ > > > > nokturn vs. reis

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-25 Thread Torsten Kaiser
31 { > 32 list->next = list; > 33 list->prev = list; > 34 } > 35 > 36 /* > > Torsten Quite a few people have been playing in that area. Can you please send the .config? # # Automatically generated make config: don

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1: m32r is_init() compile error

2007-07-25 Thread sukadev
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 04:03:04AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: | >... | > Changes since 2.6.22-rc6-mm1: | >... | > +pid-namespaces-define-is_global_init-and-is_container_init.patch | >... | > pid namespaces | >... | | m32r was forgotten: | | <-- snip -->

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-25 Thread Gabriel C
H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Gabriel C wrote: >> H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>> Gabriel C wrote: > WARNING: Absolute relocations present > Offset Info Type Sym.Value Sym.Name > c0202e73 00703601 R_386_32 c03071bc _sdata > > $ grep c03071bc System.map > c03071bc R __trac

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-25 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Gabriel C wrote: > H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> Gabriel C wrote: WARNING: Absolute relocations present Offset Info Type Sym.Value Sym.Name c0202e73 00703601 R_386_32 c03071bc _sdata $ grep c03071bc System.map c03071bc R __tracedata_end c03071bc A _sdata

2.6.23-rc1-mm1: git-kgdb breaks sh compilation

2007-07-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 04:03:04AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >... > Changes since 2.6.22-rc6-mm1: >... > git-kgdb.patch > > git trees >... This causes the following compile error on sh: <-- snip --> ... CC drivers/serial/sh-sci.o drivers/serial/sh-sci.c: In function 'put_string': d

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-25 Thread Gabriel C
H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Gabriel C wrote: >>> WARNING: Absolute relocations present >>> Offset Info Type Sym.Value Sym.Name >>> c0202e73 00703601 R_386_32 c03071bc _sdata >>> >>> $ grep c03071bc System.map >>> c03071bc R __tracedata_end >>> c03071bc A _sdata > > What is at 0xc0202e73

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-25 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Gabriel C wrote: >> >> WARNING: Absolute relocations present >> Offset Info Type Sym.Value Sym.Name >> c0202e73 00703601 R_386_32 c03071bc _sdata >> >> $ grep c03071bc System.map >> c03071bc R __tracedata_end >> c03071bc A _sdata > What is at 0xc0202e73? -hpa - To unsubscr

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-25 Thread Gabriel C
Gabriel C wrote: > H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> Sam Ravnborg wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 08:48:50PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: >>>> On 25/07/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kerne

2.6.23-rc1-mm1: m32r is_init() compile error

2007-07-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 04:03:04AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >... > Changes since 2.6.22-rc6-mm1: >... > +pid-namespaces-define-is_global_init-and-is_container_init.patch >... > pid namespaces >... m32r was forgotten: <-- snip --> ... CC arch/m32r/mm/fault.o arch/m32r/mm/fault.c: In

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-25 Thread Gabriel C
H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Sam Ravnborg wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 08:48:50PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: >>> On 25/07/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - drivers/char/nozomi.c overflow in implicit constant conversion , warnings

2007-07-25 Thread Gabriel C
... drivers/char/nozomi.c: In function 'interrupt_handler': drivers/char/nozomi.c:1298: warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion drivers/char/nozomi.c: In function 'nozomi_card_init': drivers/char/nozomi.c:1568: warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion drivers/char/nozomi.c:1592

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-25 Thread Andrew Morton
_SLEEP and > activation this option lets me build the kernel. Yes, I'm trying to hunt down a fix for that. Apparently it got repaired in the acpi pull which Linus just did. Maybe your fix is suitable? > But it does not boot: argh. > [0.00] Linux version 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 (

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-25 Thread Torsten Kaiser
PEND_SMP) from the depends of ACPI_SLEEP and activation this option lets me build the kernel. But it does not boot: [ 0.000000] Linux version 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.2.0 (Gentoo 4.2.0 p1.4)) #3 SMP Wed Jul 25 21:18:44 CEST 2007 [0.00] Command line: earlyprintk=

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1: chipsfb_pci_suspend problem

2007-07-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:48:10 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday, 25 July 2007 14:55, Cedric Le Goater wrote: > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/ &

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:40:49 +0200 Cedric Le Goater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/ > > found that one on ppc, > > drivers/char/hw_random

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-25 Thread Sam Ravnborg
l/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/ > >>> > >>> > >> Andi, this might be interesting for you > >> > >> make allmodconfig > >> make > >> [...] > >> WARNING: Absolute relocations present > >> Offset

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm1

2007-07-25 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 08:48:50PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: >> On 25/07/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc1/2.6.23-rc1-mm1/ >>> >>>

  1   2   >