Andi Kleen wrote:
>>
>> your patch did not work. See the correction below. The mask should contain
>> 1<<1 instead of 1.
>> Model 10 is now also included.
>
> Ok thanks fixed.
>
For newsetup, did we agree to just go with model >= 6 or (model >= 6 &&
model <= 10)? Note that newsetup only does th
Claas Langbehn wrote:
> Hello Andi!
>> Can someone please test if this patch works?
> it applies cleanly to 2.6.22-rc1-mm1
>
> Could you make it also enable C7 CMPXCHG8 (cx8)?
> This is because I am getting this error (as written in a diffent posting
> on this mailinglist)
>> This kernel requir
Christian Volkmann wrote:
your patch did not work. See the correction below. The mask should contain 1<<1
instead of 1.
Model 10 is now also included.
I can confirm that it works now.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
Christian Volkmann wrote:
Hi Andi,
your patch did not work. See the correction below. The mask should contain 1<<1
instead of 1.
Model 10 is now also included.
I add also a patch for setup.S. It does not print the CPUID message in case
the CPUID is wrong, cause %ds was not set proper.
Hell
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 01:47:44PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Saturday 19 May 2007 08:02, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 07:53:16AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > This preserves the 6 <= model <= 9 logic of the C code; this means
> > > if VIA ever brings out model >= 10 it
On Saturday 19 May 2007 13:42, Christian Volkmann wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Can someone please test if this patch works?
> >
> > This preserves the 6 <= model <= 9 logic of the C code; this means
> > if VIA ever brings out model >= 10 it hopefully sets this bit by default.
> > Dave, do you ha
On Saturday 19 May 2007 08:02, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 07:53:16AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > This preserves the 6 <= model <= 9 logic of the C code; this means
> > if VIA ever brings out model >= 10 it hopefully sets this bit by
> > default. Dave, do you have any informati
Andi Kleen wrote:
> Can someone please test if this patch works?
>
> This preserves the 6 <= model <= 9 logic of the C code; this means
> if VIA ever brings out model >= 10 it hopefully sets this bit by default.
> Dave, do you have any information to the contrary?
>
> -Andi
>
Hi Andi,
your p
Hello Andi!
Can someone please test if this patch works?
it applies cleanly to 2.6.22-rc1-mm1
Could you make it also enable C7 CMPXCHG8 (cx8)?
This is because I am getting this error (as written in a diffent posting
on this mailinglist)
> This kernel requires the following features not prese
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 07:53:16AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> This preserves the 6 <= model <= 9 logic of the C code; this means
> if VIA ever brings out model >= 10 it hopefully sets this bit by default.
> Dave, do you have any information to the contrary?
Model 10 (Esther) has the same feat
On Thursday 17 May 2007 02:42, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 02:09:16AM +0200, Christian wrote:
> > my small VIA C3_2 box does not boot with 2.6.22-rc1.
> > It even does not uncompress the kernel.
> >
> > The configuration as M386 M486 works. But M586 + MVIAC3_2
> > does not work
11 matches
Mail list logo
