Sorry now it's ok...
I've do an mkfs.vfat and it's good now.
Sorry for this "stupid" post ;-)
On 5/24/07, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:56:04PM +0200, Amaury De Ganseman wrote:
> It's the same with sdc1
exactly the same error ? (the dmesg only listed the sdc
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:56:04PM +0200, Amaury De Ganseman wrote:
> It's the same with sdc1
exactly the same error ? (the dmesg only listed the sdc errors)
what does fdisk -l /dev/sdc look like ?
does fsck.vfat /dev/sda1 find any errors?
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsu
It's the same with sdc1
Note: I'm on a 64-bit machine.
here is my dmesg (nls_cp437 loaded after I see this error on dmesg)
On 5/24/07, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:53:31AM +0200, Amaury De Ganseman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since 2.6.21 I can't mount my usb key (
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:53:31AM +0200, Amaury De Ganseman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since 2.6.21 I can't mount my usb key (vfat).
> I don't know if it's related to the vfat patch in 2.6.21.2
>
> Here is the dmesg error parts:
>
> FAT: invalid media value (0xb9)
> VFS: Can't find a valid F
Hi,
Since 2.6.21 I can't mount my usb key (vfat).
I don't know if it's related to the vfat patch in 2.6.21.2
Here is the dmesg error parts:
FAT: invalid media value (0xb9)
VFS: Can't find a valid FAT filesystem on dev sdc.
Tell me if you need more infos.
Amaury
-
To unsubscribe from thi
5 matches
Mail list logo