> Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 18:20 schrieb Prakash Punnoor:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I can't scan anymore. :-( I don't know which rc kernel introduced it, but
> > this are the messages I get (w/o touching the device/usb cable except
> > pluggin it in for the first time):
>
Hi,
I found quickly booted in
Am Freitag 19 Januar 2007 12:29 schrieb Oliver Neukum:
> Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 18:20 schrieb Prakash Punnoor:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I can't scan anymore. :-( I don't know which rc kernel introduced it, but
> > this are the messages I get (w/o touching the device/usb cable except
> > pluggin it i
Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 18:20 schrieb Prakash Punnoor:
> Hi,
>
> I can't scan anymore. :-( I don't know which rc kernel introduced it, but
> this
> are the messages I get (w/o touching the device/usb cable except pluggin it
> in for the first time):
Hi,
I need "lsusb -v" for your devic
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 11:03:35AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > Am Sonntag, 14. Januar 2007 20:47 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > > Can anyone suggest another approach?
> > > >
> > > > Alan Stern
> > >
> > > Just a thought, you could use both a black
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Montag, 15. Januar 2007 17:03 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > > Upon further thought, a module parameter won't do as the problem
> > > will arise without a driver loaded. A sysfs parameter turns the whole
> > >
Am Montag, 15. Januar 2007 17:03 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Upon further thought, a module parameter won't do as the problem
> > will arise without a driver loaded. A sysfs parameter turns the whole
> > affair into a race condition. Will you set the guard p
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 14. Januar 2007 20:47 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > Can anyone suggest another approach?
> > >
> > > Alan Stern
> >
> > Just a thought, you could use both a blacklist approach, and a module
> > paramater, or something in sysfs, to allow
Am Sonntag, 14. Januar 2007 20:47 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > Can anyone suggest another approach?
> >
> > Alan Stern
>
> Just a thought, you could use both a blacklist approach, and a module
> paramater, or something in sysfs, to allow specifying devices that won't
> be suspend and resume co
Am Sonntag, 14. Januar 2007 20:47 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > When the scanner is not in use, the system automatically suspends it after
> > two seconds. When you use sane the scanner is resumed, but it then
> > disconnects itself and reconnects. Sane is left trying to control the
> > disconne
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
Am Sonntag 14 Januar 2007 10:28 schrieb Oliver Neukum:
Am Sonntag, 14. Januar 2007 10:08 schrieb Prakash Punnoor:
Am Donnerstag 11 Januar 2007 18:28 schrieb Oliver Neukum:
Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 18:2
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> Am Sonntag 14 Januar 2007 10:28 schrieb Oliver Neukum:
> > Am Sonntag, 14. Januar 2007 10:08 schrieb Prakash Punnoor:
> > > Am Donnerstag 11 Januar 2007 18:28 schrieb Oliver Neukum:
> > > > Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 18:20 schrieb Prakash Punnoor:
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 10:08:37AM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 11 Januar 2007 18:28 schrieb Oliver Neukum:
> > Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 18:20 schrieb Prakash Punnoor:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I can't scan anymore. :-( I don't know which rc kernel introduced it, but
> > > this a
Am Sonntag 14 Januar 2007 10:28 schrieb Oliver Neukum:
>
> Have you confirmed that by using a kernel without CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND ?
BTW, these are my USB config options, which don't seem to make problems
anymore as long as USB_SUSPEND isn't activated:
CONFIG_USB_ARCH_HAS_HCD=y
CONFIG_USB_ARCH_HAS
Am Sonntag 14 Januar 2007 10:28 schrieb Oliver Neukum:
> Am Sonntag, 14. Januar 2007 10:08 schrieb Prakash Punnoor:
> > Am Donnerstag 11 Januar 2007 18:28 schrieb Oliver Neukum:
> > > Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 18:20 schrieb Prakash Punnoor:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I can't scan anymore. :-(
Am Sonntag, 14. Januar 2007 10:08 schrieb Prakash Punnoor:
> Am Donnerstag 11 Januar 2007 18:28 schrieb Oliver Neukum:
> > Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 18:20 schrieb Prakash Punnoor:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I can't scan anymore. :-( I don't know which rc kernel introduced it, but
> > > this are the
Am Donnerstag 11 Januar 2007 18:28 schrieb Oliver Neukum:
> Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 18:20 schrieb Prakash Punnoor:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I can't scan anymore. :-( I don't know which rc kernel introduced it, but
> > this are the messages I get (w/o touching the device/usb cable except
> > pluggin i
Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 18:20 schrieb Prakash Punnoor:
> Hi,
>
> I can't scan anymore. :-( I don't know which rc kernel introduced it, but
> this
> are the messages I get (w/o touching the device/usb cable except pluggin it
> in for the first time):
>
> usb 1-1.2: new full speed USB dev
Hi,
I can't scan anymore. :-( I don't know which rc kernel introduced it, but this
are the messages I get (w/o touching the device/usb cable except pluggin it
in for the first time):
usb 1-1.2: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 4
ehci_hcd :00:0b.1: qh 81007bc6c280 (#0
18 matches
Mail list logo
