Ok, here it is the patch, just a draft.
I have checked the Makefile to ensure that ks0108 was being called before than
cfag12864b at boot, still, I'm not sure and I don't know if this will prevent
the crash if ks0108 fails to init.
Daniel, please test it.
drivers-add-lcd-support-update10.patch
Le 01.02.2007 22:52, Edward Shishkin a écrit :
Laurent Riffard wrote:
Le 01.02.2007 21:04, Edward Shishkin a écrit :
Laurent, would you please try 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 + this patch:
http://lkml.org/lkml/diff/2007/2/1/195/1
Reiser4 works fine with 2.6.20-rc6-mm2 or 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 without any
ad
. Saveliev a écrit :
Hello
On Saturday 06 January 2007 13:58, Laurent Riffard wrote:
Hello,
got this with 2.6.20-rc3-mm1:
===
SysRq : Show Blocked State
freesibling
task PCstack pid father child younger
On Saturday 06 January 2007 13:58, Laurent Riffard wrote:
Hello,
got this with 2.6.20-rc3-mm1:
===
SysRq : Show Blocked State
freesibling
task PCstack pid father child younger older
umountD
Riffard wrote:
Hello,
got this with 2.6.20-rc3-mm1:
===
SysRq : Show Blocked State
freesibling
task PCstack pid father child younger older
umountD C013135E 6044 1168 1150
(NOTLB
On 2/1/07, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 18:39 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On 2/1/07, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 18:13 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Well, I use the word "module" for both cases:
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 18:39 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On 2/1/07, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 18:13 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Well, I use the word "module" for both cases: When I modprobe
> > > cfag12864b, if ks0108 fails, it
On 2/1/07, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 18:13 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> >
> >
>
> Well, I use the word "module" for both cases: When I modprobe
> cfag12864b, if ks0108 fails, it doesn't get linked. So I thought the
> same happen for built-in drivers (in other
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 18:13 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> >
> >
>
> Well, I use the word "module" for both cases: When I modprobe
> cfag12864b, if ks0108 fails, it doesn't get linked. So I thought the
> same happen for built-in drivers (in other words, I didn't think
> cfag12864b would be linked i
On 2/1/07, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 16:16 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> The problem is easy:
>
> ks0108_init() prints the error message and exit with -EINVAL, so the
> module isn't loaded properly.
>
> However, cfag12864b_init() is called, although ks0108 fail
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 16:16 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> The problem is easy:
>
> ks0108_init() prints the error message and exit with -EINVAL, so the
> module isn't loaded properly.
>
> However, cfag12864b_init() is called, although ks0108 failed. It
> returns 0 and after a while cfag12864b call
CC LKML)
>
> The options,
>
> CONFIG_CFAG12864B=y
> CONFIG_CFAG12864B_RATE=20
>
> causes a crash at boot in 2.6.20-rc3-mm1. I don't have the hardware
> associated with the options. It looks like it just doesn't have guards
> to detect if the hardware doesn't exists
On 1/7/07, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(forgot to CC LKML)
The options,
CONFIG_CFAG12864B=y
CONFIG_CFAG12864B_RATE=20
causes a crash at boot in 2.6.20-rc3-mm1. I don't have the hardware
associated with the options. It looks like it just doesn't have guards
On 1/30/07, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tomasz, is this still happening in 2.6.20-rc6-mm3?
>
> err. We merged that patch. So perhaps 2.6.20-rc6 now crashes in the
> same manner?
no, we havent merged that patch yet, but it's:
x86_64-m
On 1/30/07, Tomasz Kvarsin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/30/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:20:38 +0300
> "Tomasz Kvarsin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I can not boot machine with 2.6.20-rc3-mm1 and 2.6.
On 1/30/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:20:38 +0300
"Tomasz Kvarsin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can not boot machine with 2.6.20-rc3-mm1 and 2.6.20-rc2-mm1.
> I made binary search, patch bellow cause this bug:
> $qu
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll try to reproduce this.
cannot see the crash in qemu - i suspect it's .config dependent. Tomasz,
could you send me the .config you used?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a messag
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tomasz, is this still happening in 2.6.20-rc6-mm3?
>
> err. We merged that patch. So perhaps 2.6.20-rc6 now crashes in the
> same manner?
no, we havent merged that patch yet, but it's:
x86_64-mm-improve-sched_clock-on-i686.patch
I bet this is
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:20:38 +0300
"Tomasz Kvarsin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can not boot machine with 2.6.20-rc3-mm1 and 2.6.20-rc2-mm1.
> I made binary search, patch bellow cause this bug:
> $quilt top
> patches/sched-improve-sched_clock-on-i686.patch
&
with 2.6.20-rc3-mm1:
===
SysRq : Show Blocked State
freesibling
task PCstack pid father child younger older
umountD C013135E 6044 1168 1150 (NOTLB)
de591ae4 0086
rote:
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> got this with 2.6.20-rc3-mm1:
> > >>
> > >> ===
> > >> SysRq : Show Blocked State
> > >>
> > >> free
Hello
On Saturday 13 January 2007 01:56, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> Le 06.01.2007 19:58, Vladimir V. Saveliev a écrit :
> > Hello
> >
> > On Saturday 06 January 2007 13:58, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> got this with 2.6.20-rc3-m
On , [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:02:00 PST, Andrew Morton said:
>
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc3/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/
Still seeing this in -rc4-mm1..
> With git-block.patch applied, my system lock
Le 06.01.2007 19:58, Vladimir V. Saveliev a écrit :
Hello
On Saturday 06 January 2007 13:58, Laurent Riffard wrote:
Hello,
got this with 2.6.20-rc3-mm1:
===
SysRq : Show Blocked State
freesibling
task PC
Frederik Deweerdt napisał(a):
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 09:50:20PM +0100, Maciej Rutecki wrote:
>> Frederik Deweerdt napisał(a):
>>
>>> See:
>>> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc3/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/hot-fixes/
>>> Thi
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 09:50:20PM +0100, Maciej Rutecki wrote:
> Frederik Deweerdt napisał(a):
>
> > See:
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc3/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/hot-fixes/
> > This should fix it.
> > Regards,
> > Frede
Frederik Deweerdt napisał(a):
> See:
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc3/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/hot-fixes/
> This should fix it.
> Regards,
> Frederik
>>
I don't use reiser4 or cpufreq, see my .config.
--
Maciej Rutecki <[EMAIL PR
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 09:55:24 +0100, Jens Axboe said:
> On Sat, Jan 06 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:02:00 PST, Andrew Morton said:
> >
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc
3/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/
>
===
See:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc3/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/hot-fixes/
This should fix it.
Regards,
Frederik
>
>
>
> --
> Maciej Rutecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://www.unixy.pl
> LTG - Linux Testers Group
> (http://www.star
config-2.6.20-rc3-mm1.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
dmesg.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
lspci.txt.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
ver_linux.txt.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
ge, it works perfectly for me now. Not using -mm though, but the
> > plug branch. And it did hang before. Fengguang, any change for you?
>
> 2.6.20-rc3-mm1 plus your patch works for me.
>
> Lucky enough to found this before giving up:
>
> mount takes 39s, and um
line void
> > > - blk_unplug_current();
> > > + blk_replug_current_nested();
> >
> > Does not help. Dmesg follows:
>
> [snip]
>
> Strange, it works perfectly for me now. Not using -mm though, but the
> plug branch. And it did hang before. Fengguang, any cha
On Mon, Jan 08 2007, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On Monday 08 January 2007 09:52, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > --- a/block/ll_rw_blk.c
> > +++ b/block/ll_rw_blk.c
> > @@ -1542,7 +1542,7 @@ static inline void
> > - blk_unplug_current();
> > + blk_replug_current_nested();
>
> Does not help. Dmesg follows:
> The idea behind this is to have a probing thread for each device that
> does the actual work (call probe for the matching drivers) so that
> multiple devices can be probed in parallel. The decision to do this can
> only be made at the bus level.
>
> Previously, the code made it possible to have
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:19:41 +0100 (CET)
Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2.6.20-rc3-mm1 hangs on boot on my IBM T42p when compiled with ACPI_BAY=y.
> Below is the trace of two BUGs I get.
Hi,
I was able to duplicate this problem - it only occurs when the bay
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 08:24:44 +1100,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc3/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/broken-out/driver-core-per-subsystem-multithreaded-probing.patch
>
> Hrm. I disagree with this ch
On Monday 08 January 2007 09:52, Jens Axboe wrote:
> --- a/block/ll_rw_blk.c
> +++ b/block/ll_rw_blk.c
> @@ -1542,7 +1542,7 @@ static inline void
> - blk_unplug_current();
> + blk_replug_current_nested();
Does not help. Dmesg follows:
[0.00] Linux version 2.6.20-
* Tomasz Kvarsin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If anybody interesting this changes by Vivek Goyal:
>
> -int tsc_disable __cpuinitdata = 0;
> +int tsc_disable = 0;
ok, indeed.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAI
TED]> wrote:
On 1/5/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:20:38 +0300
> "Tomasz Kvarsin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I can not boot machine with 2.6.20-rc3-mm1 and 2.6.20-rc2-mm1.
> > I made binary search, patch bellow
On Sat, Jan 06 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:02:00 PST, Andrew Morton said:
>
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc3/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/
>
> With git-block.patch applied, my system locks up *hard* a
On Sat, Jan 06 2007, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On Saturday 06 January 2007 11:02, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 06 2007, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > > On Saturday 06 January 2007 04:59, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc3-mm1x.bz2 i
Machine: Linux <...> 2.6.20-rc3-mm1 #2 Mon Jan 8 00:24:59 EST 2007 i686 unknown
In normal (light) use, I experienced a long (~20s?) freeze, and errors
regarding hdc appeared in dmesg, along with the BUG. SMART on hdc
doesn't report any errors except a bad SMART checksum (I think th
(forgot to CC LKML)
The options,
CONFIG_CFAG12864B=y
CONFIG_CFAG12864B_RATE=20
causes a crash at boot in 2.6.20-rc3-mm1. I don't have the hardware
associated with the options. It looks like it just doesn't have guards
to detect if the hardware doesn't exists.
Here is the crash,
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 17:59:06 +0100, Mattia Dongili said:
> On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 08:44:51AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > One of these 3 patches:
> >
> > rewrite-lock-in-cpufreq-to-eliminate-cpufreq-hotplug-related-issues.patch
> Does the following help?
>
> Signed-off-by: Mattia Dongili
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 11:14:21 PST, Andrew Morton said:
>
> Yeah, that's an akpm screwup, sorry.
>
> Take a peek in
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc3/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/hot-fixes/
Confirming that reiser4-sb_sync_inodes-fix.pa
Hello
On Saturday 06 January 2007 13:58, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> Le 05.01.2007 07:02, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> > Temporarily at
> >
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/
> >
> > will appear later at
> >
> >
> > ftp://
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 10:20:49 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:02:00 PST, Andrew Morton said:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc3/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/
>
> reiser4-sb_sync_inodes.patch causes my system to lo
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 08:44:51AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:02:00 PST, Andrew Morton said:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc3/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/
>
> One of these 3 patches:
>
> rewrite-l
On Sat, Jan 06 2007, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> Le 05.01.2007 07:02, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> >Temporarily at
> >
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/
> >
> >will appear later at
> >
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/k
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:02:00 PST, Andrew Morton said:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc3/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/
reiser4-sb_sync_inodes.patch causes my system to lock hard (no alt-sysrq,
need to power cycle) *very* early in the boot - earlyprintk
Le 06.01.2007 11:58, Laurent Riffard a écrit :
Le 05.01.2007 07:02, Andrew Morton a écrit :
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/
will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc3/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/
Hello,
got
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:02:00 PST, Andrew Morton said:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc3/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/
One of these 3 patches:
rewrite-lock-in-cpufreq-to-eliminate-cpufreq-hotplug-related-issues.patch
rewrite-lock-in-cpufreq-to-eliminate-c
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:02:00 PST, Andrew Morton said:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc3/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/
With git-block.patch applied, my system locks up *hard* at system shutdown
time - even alt-sysrq doesn't do anything. Need to do
On Sat, Jan 06 2007, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On Saturday 06 January 2007 11:02, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 06 2007, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > > On Saturday 06 January 2007 04:59, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc3-mm1x.bz2 i
Le 05.01.2007 07:02, Andrew Morton a écrit :
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/
will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc3/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/
Hello,
got this with 2.6.20-rc3-mm1
On Saturday 06 January 2007 11:02, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 06 2007, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > On Saturday 06 January 2007 04:59, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc3-mm1x.bz2 is basically
> > > 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, minus git-block.
On Sat, Jan 06 2007, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On Saturday 06 January 2007 04:59, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc3-mm1x.bz2 is basically
> > 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, minus git-block.patch. Can you and Torsten please test
> > that, see if th
On Saturday 06 January 2007 04:59, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc3-mm1x.bz2 is basically
> 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, minus git-block.patch. Can you and Torsten please test
> that, see if the hangs go away?
Works for me too.
Also the locking imbalance
On Fri 2007-01-05 14:19:41, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2.6.20-rc3-mm1 hangs on boot on my IBM T42p when compiled with ACPI_BAY=y.
> Below is the trace of two BUGs I get.
>
> When compiled with ACPI_BAY=n, it boots fine.
ACPI people usually prefer entries in bugzilla.kerne
gt; >
> > It is an ext3 fs on top of /dev/md0, RAID1.
>
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc3-mm1x.bz2 is basically
> 2.6.20-rc3-mm1,
> minus git-block.patch. Can you and Torsten please test that, see if the hangs
> go away?
Yes, now it mounts OK.
Thanks.
-
To u
c3-mm1x.bz2 is basically 2.6.20-rc3-mm1,
minus git-block.patch. Can you and Torsten please test that, see if the hangs
go away?
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://v
: (&sysfs_inode_imutex_key){--..}, at: []
mutex_lock+0x25/0x30
Thanks,
Wu
#
# Automatically generated make config: don't edit
# Linux kernel version: 2.6.20-rc3-mm1
# Fri Jan 5 22:15:34 2007
#
CONFIG_X86_64=y
CONFIG_64BIT=y
CONFIG_X86=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL=y
CONFIG_ZON
. struct driver -> multithread_probe is gone in -mm ?
> >
>
> yeah, it moved into struct bus_type.
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc3/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/broken-out/driver-core-per-subsystem-multithreaded-probing.patch
Hrm. I disagree with t
> > make: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel] Blad 2
> >
> > I guess someone who knows multithread code should take a look at it.
>
> Hrm. struct driver -> multithread_probe is gone in -mm ?
>
yeah, it moved into struct bus_type.
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 17:23 +0100, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Doesn't build on my iMac G3 based garage jukebox ;-)
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.c:479: error: unknown field
> 'multithread_probe' specified in initializer
> arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.c:479: warning: in
On 1/5/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:20:38 +0300
"Tomasz Kvarsin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can not boot machine with 2.6.20-rc3-mm1 and 2.6.20-rc2-mm1.
> I made binary search, patch bellow cause this bug:
> $qu
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:20:38 +0300
"Tomasz Kvarsin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can not boot machine with 2.6.20-rc3-mm1 and 2.6.20-rc2-mm1.
> I made binary search, patch bellow cause this bug:
> $quilt top
> patches/sched-improve-sched_clock-on-i686.patch
&
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
> Doesn't build on my iMac G3 based garage jukebox ;-)
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.c:479: error: unknown field
> 'multithread_probe' specified in initializer
> arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.c:479: warning: initialization makes pointer
Hello,
Doesn't build on my iMac G3 based garage jukebox ;-)
arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.c:479: error: unknown field 'multithread_probe'
specified in initializer
arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.c:479: warning: initialization makes pointer
from integer without a cast
make[1]: *** [ar
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > I trust you have ACPI_IBM_BAY=n to use ACPI_BAY=y ? I don't think it has
> > > anything to do with the issue you have, but just in case...
> > The kernel hangs with CONFIG_ACPI_BAY, with CONFIG_ACPI_IBM_BAY it works
> > just fine.
> I
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > 2.6.20-rc3-mm1 hangs on boot on my IBM T42p when compiled with
> > > ACPI_BAY=y.
> > I trust you have ACPI_IBM_BAY=n to use ACPI_BAY=y ? I don't think it has
&
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > 2.6.20-rc3-mm1 hangs on boot on my IBM T42p when compiled with ACPI_BAY=y.
> I trust you have ACPI_IBM_BAY=n to use ACPI_BAY=y ? I don't think it has
> anything to do with the issue you have, but just in case...
The
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> 2.6.20-rc3-mm1 hangs on boot on my IBM T42p when compiled with ACPI_BAY=y.
I trust you have ACPI_IBM_BAY=n to use ACPI_BAY=y ? I don't think it has
anything to do with the issue you have, but just in case...
--
"One disk to rule them
I can not boot machine with 2.6.20-rc3-mm1 and 2.6.20-rc2-mm1.
I made binary search, patch bellow cause this bug:
$quilt top
patches/sched-improve-sched_clock-on-i686.patch
backtrace which I got by connecting "gdb" to machine:
_raw_spin_lock (lock=0xc06c0c60) at lib/spinlock_debug
Hi,
2.6.20-rc3-mm1 hangs on boot on my IBM T42p when compiled with ACPI_BAY=y.
Below is the trace of two BUGs I get.
When compiled with ACPI_BAY=n, it boots fine.
The traces are hand-rewritten (no serial console on that machine), so I
have omitted the code offsets in the stacktraces.
ACPI
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/
will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc3/2.6.20-rc3-mm1/
- Added the IBM ACPi driver tree to the -mm lineup, as git-ibm-acpi.patch
(Henrique de Moraes
76 matches
Mail list logo
