Re: 2.6.13-rc7-rt3 compile fix

2005-08-26 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 18:43 -0500, K.R. Foley wrote: > Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Oops! my bad. I saw that needed locking, but I didn't have the tracing > > on (I was trying for internal deadlocks), so that part of the code > > wasn't compiling. If you turn off tracing it would compile :-) > > Un

Re: 2.6.13-rc7-rt3 compile fix

2005-08-26 Thread K.R. Foley
Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 16:17 -0500, K.R. Foley wrote: > >>2.6.13-rc7-rt3 won't compile without the simple patch below. >> > > - __raw_spin_lock(old_owner->task->pi_lock); > + __raw_spin_lock(&old_owner->task->pi_lock); > TRACE_WARN_ON_LOCKED(plist_empty

Re: 2.6.13-rc7-rt3 compile fix

2005-08-26 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 16:17 -0500, K.R. Foley wrote: > 2.6.13-rc7-rt3 won't compile without the simple patch below. > - __raw_spin_lock(old_owner->task->pi_lock); + __raw_spin_lock(&old_owner->task->pi_lock); TRACE_WARN_ON_LOCKED(plist_empty(&waiter->pi_list)); TRACE_W

2.6.13-rc7-rt3 compile fix

2005-08-26 Thread K.R. Foley
2.6.13-rc7-rt3 won't compile without the simple patch below. -- kr --- linux-2.6.13/kernel/rt.c.orig 2005-08-26 15:51:35.0 -0500 +++ linux-2.6.13/kernel/rt.c 2005-08-26 15:51:55.0 -0500 @@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ struct rt_mutex_waiter *w; struct plist *curr1; - __raw_spin_lock(