On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 18:43 -0500, K.R. Foley wrote:
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Oops! my bad. I saw that needed locking, but I didn't have the tracing
> > on (I was trying for internal deadlocks), so that part of the code
> > wasn't compiling. If you turn off tracing it would compile :-)
>
> Un
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 16:17 -0500, K.R. Foley wrote:
>
>>2.6.13-rc7-rt3 won't compile without the simple patch below.
>>
>
> - __raw_spin_lock(old_owner->task->pi_lock);
> + __raw_spin_lock(&old_owner->task->pi_lock);
> TRACE_WARN_ON_LOCKED(plist_empty
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 16:17 -0500, K.R. Foley wrote:
> 2.6.13-rc7-rt3 won't compile without the simple patch below.
>
- __raw_spin_lock(old_owner->task->pi_lock);
+ __raw_spin_lock(&old_owner->task->pi_lock);
TRACE_WARN_ON_LOCKED(plist_empty(&waiter->pi_list));
TRACE_W
2.6.13-rc7-rt3 won't compile without the simple patch below.
--
kr
--- linux-2.6.13/kernel/rt.c.orig 2005-08-26 15:51:35.0 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.13/kernel/rt.c 2005-08-26 15:51:55.0 -0500
@@ -672,7 +672,7 @@
struct rt_mutex_waiter *w;
struct plist *curr1;
- __raw_spin_lock(
4 matches
Mail list logo