On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 11:26:33AM +1000, Grant Coady wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:27:22 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >You should edit init/Kconfig to disallow CONFIG_CLEAN_COMPILE=n, since
> >any errors you see with CONFIG_BROKEN=y aren't interesting.
>
> Straight over
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:27:22 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>You should edit init/Kconfig to disallow CONFIG_CLEAN_COMPILE=n, since
>any errors you see with CONFIG_BROKEN=y aren't interesting.
Straight over the top of my head yesterday :) Is the following
what you had in mind?
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:27:22 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Looking at the .config, the problem is actually:
> CONFIG_BROKEN=y
>
>You should edit init/Kconfig to disallow CONFIG_CLEAN_COMPILE=n, since
>any errors you see with CONFIG_BROKEN=y aren't interesting.
Very good point.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 07:13:02AM +1000, Grant Coady wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:39:32 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 05:42:58AM +1000, Grant Coady wrote:
> >> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:13:27 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >i
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:39:32 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 05:42:58AM +1000, Grant Coady wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:13:27 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >it's generally useful, but the target kernel should be the latest -mm
>> >
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 05:42:58AM +1000, Grant Coady wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:13:27 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >it's generally useful, but the target kernel should be the latest -mm
> >kernel.
> 097-error:drivers/char/drm/drm_memory.h:163: error: redefinition of
>
On 7/24/05, Grant Coady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:13:27 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> With > 2k (raw) errors in 97.something builds of 2.6.12.3, why go
> looking for trouble in -mm?
Because -mm is the development tree. The things in -mm are what's
eve
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:13:27 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>it's generally useful, but the target kernel should be the latest -mm
>kernel.
097-error:drivers/char/drm/drm_memory.h:163: error: redefinition of
`drm_ioremap_nocache'
097-error:drivers/char/drm/drm_memory.h:163: error
On 7/24/05, Grant Coady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:01:22 +0200, Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> context. Deliberately simplistic for traceability at the moment, truncated
> >> error length for this post.
> >>
> >If you could put the data online somewhere I'd be
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:01:22 +0200, Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> context. Deliberately simplistic for traceability at the moment, truncated
>> error length for this post.
>>
>If you could put the data online somewhere I'd be interrested in
>taking a look at it.
7.4MB raw data --> low
On 7/24/05, Grant Coady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Few days ago I compiled 241 random configurations of 2.6.13-rc3, today
> I finally got around to parsing the results, top 40, sorted by name.
> Percentage is error_builds / total_builds.
>
> build script similar to:
> count=0
> w
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 04:28:54PM +1000, Grant Coady wrote:
> Greetings,
Hi Grant,
> Few days ago I compiled 241 random configurations of 2.6.13-rc3, today
> I finally got around to parsing the results, top 40, sorted by name.
> Percentage is error_builds / total_builds.
>
> build script si
Greetings,
Few days ago I compiled 241 random configurations of 2.6.13-rc3, today
I finally got around to parsing the results, top 40, sorted by name.
Percentage is error_builds / total_builds.
build script similar to:
count=0
while [ $((++count)) -le $limit ]; do
trial=$(printf %003d
13 matches
Mail list logo
