Re: 2.6.13-mm1 X86_64: All 32bit programs segfault

2005-09-08 Thread Parag Warudkar
Andi Kleen wrote: If you catch a crash in gdb and type x/i $pc what do you see? -Andi Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 1431820864 (LWP 2839)] 0x00c40471 in __pthread_initialize_minimal_internal () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 (gdb) x/i $pc 0xc40471 <_

Re: 2.6.13-mm1 X86_64: All 32bit programs segfault

2005-09-08 Thread Parag Warudkar
Andrew Morton wrote: it works fine. I can't reproduce this with the current -mm lineup. I compiled up a 32-bit app on x86 and transferred that across. Maybe it got fixed. Please test 2.6.13-mm2, which appears to be an hour or two away. If it still fails then I'd need a recipe (includi

Re: 2.6.13-mm1 X86_64: All 32bit programs segfault

2005-09-08 Thread Andi Kleen
On Thursday 08 September 2005 10:44, Andrew Morton wrote: > Parag Warudkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andi Kleen wrote: > > >Hmm - not many x86-64 patches in mm1. 2.6.13 definitely works. > > > > 2.6.13-git7 works. So something in -mm has gone bad (if not x86_64, may > > be i386 or arch-inde

Re: 2.6.13-mm1 X86_64: All 32bit programs segfault

2005-09-08 Thread Andrew Morton
Parag Warudkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andi Kleen wrote: > > >Hmm - not many x86-64 patches in mm1. 2.6.13 definitely works. > > > > > 2.6.13-git7 works. So something in -mm has gone bad (if not x86_64, may > be i386 or arch-independent changes?) > It seems it has got something to

Re: 2.6.13-mm1 X86_64: All 32bit programs segfault

2005-09-07 Thread Andi Kleen
On Thursday 08 September 2005 07:10, Parag Warudkar wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > >Hmm - not many x86-64 patches in mm1. 2.6.13 definitely works. > > 2.6.13-git7 works. So something in -mm has gone bad (if not x86_64, may > be i386 or arch-independent changes?) > It seems it has got something to do

Re: 2.6.13-mm1 X86_64: All 32bit programs segfault

2005-09-07 Thread Parag Warudkar
Andi Kleen wrote: Hmm - not many x86-64 patches in mm1. 2.6.13 definitely works. 2.6.13-git7 works. So something in -mm has gone bad (if not x86_64, may be i386 or arch-independent changes?) It seems it has got something to do with the sys_set_tid_address as evident from the strace output b

Re: 2.6.13-mm1 X86_64: All 32bit programs segfault

2005-09-07 Thread Andi Kleen
On Thursday 08 September 2005 05:54, Parag Warudkar wrote: > I am clueless as to what's going on but just raising a flag in case it > is a not yet known problem. > Thunderbird, 32bit Sun Java and Opera are the ones I tried. They all > work fine with the Fedora 2.6.12-x kernel but > consistently seg

2.6.13-mm1 X86_64: All 32bit programs segfault

2005-09-07 Thread Parag Warudkar
I am clueless as to what's going on but just raising a flag in case it is a not yet known problem. Thunderbird, 32bit Sun Java and Opera are the ones I tried. They all work fine with the Fedora 2.6.12-x kernel but consistently seg fault with 2.6.13-mm1. Parag Sample stack trace for jav