Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1: ACPI=y, ACPI_BOOT=n problems

2005-04-06 Thread Andrew Morton
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>arch/i386/kernel/setup.c: In function 'setup_arch': > >> arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1571: warning: implicit declaration of function > >> 'acpi_boot_table_init' > >> arch/i386/kernel/se

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1: ACPI=y, ACPI_BOOT=n problems

2005-04-06 Thread Steven Cole
Andrew Morton wrote: Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: arch/i386/kernel/setup.c: In function 'setup_arch': arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1571: warning: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_boot_table_init' arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1572: warning: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_boot_init'

RE: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1: ACPI=y, ACPI_BOOT=n problems

2005-04-06 Thread Brown, Len
>@Len: >ACPI=y and ACPI_BOOT=n seems to be a legal configuration (with >X86_HT=y), but it breaks into pieces if you try the compilation. yeah, don't do that:-) I'm sorry I didn't push the patch to delete CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT earlier. For now, just enable them both. thanks, -Len - To unsubscribe from

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1: ACPI=y, ACPI_BOOT=n problems

2005-04-05 Thread Andrew Morton
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > arch/i386/kernel/setup.c: In function 'setup_arch': > arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1571: warning: implicit declaration of function > 'acpi_boot_table_init' > arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1572: warning: implicit declaration of function > 'acpi_boot_init' diff

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1: ACPI=y, ACPI_BOOT=n problems

2005-04-05 Thread Steven Cole
Adrian Bunk wrote: On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 12:32:52AM +1200, Reuben Farrelly wrote: Hi again At 12:14 a.m. 6/04/2005, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 08:34:11PM +1200, Reuben Farrelly wrote: Hi, Hi Reuben, ... Hrm. Something changed between the last -mm release which compiled through,

2.6.12-rc2-mm1: ACPI=y, ACPI_BOOT=n problems

2005-04-05 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 12:32:52AM +1200, Reuben Farrelly wrote: > Hi again > > At 12:14 a.m. 6/04/2005, Adrian Bunk wrote: > >On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 08:34:11PM +1200, Reuben Farrelly wrote: > > > >> Hi, > > > >Hi Reuben, > > > >>... > >> Hrm. Something changed between the last -mm release which