> Sometimes it takes either the kernel tree or our website some time to get
> in 'sync' with the latest driver version. The latest driver version is
> 1.02.00.007.
>
> There may be DAC960 like /proc support at some point for GUI haters.
Publishing enough info to let people write a GPL non gu
On 19 Jun 2001, at 5:00, Stefan Traby wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 07:20:06PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Folks, I believe I have a reproducible test case which corrupts
> > > data in 2.4.5.
> >
> > 2.4.5 has an out of date 3ware driver that is short
>
> > + 1.02.00.007 - Fix possible nu
> Well, I do not understand how the driver is distributed.
> The actual 3ware stuff won't compile on 2.4.x, and the stuff in kernel
> is always different from 3ware releases.
The stuff in the -ac tree is directly from 3ware
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 07:20:06PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Folks, I believe I have a reproducible test case which corrupts data in
> > 2.4.5.
>
> 2.4.5 has an out of date 3ware driver that is short
> + 1.02.00.007 - Fix possible null pointer dereferences in tw_ioctl().
> + R
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 11:54:20PM +0400, Eugene Crosser wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> any problems since 2.4.5 was published, they seem to have surfaced
> >> immediately after I created a rather big file capturing video with
> >> broa
Nuther anecdote:
I was creating a big swapfile on ext2 (because 2.4.5 needs too much swap)
with dd (SCSI disk on Sym53c8-something controller) and corrupted
the partition THEN fsck would cause the kernel to panic. I thought
I had some bad hw ... the box sits on my office floor waiting resurrecti
> any problems since 2.4.5 was published, they seem to have surfaced
> immediately after I created a rather big file capturing video with
> broadcast2000 (video card is bt848). Filesystem is ext2.
Thats something I've seen reported elsehwere. The high bandwidth capture card
stuff seems to show u
On Tuesday, June 12, 2001 01:17:49 PM -0700 Larry McVoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Folks, I believe I have a reproducible test case which corrupts data in
> 2.4.5.
>
> We do nightly, weekly, and monthly backups by copying our entire /home
> partition on the company file server:
>
> Filesyst
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 01:17:49PM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> Folks, I believe I have a reproducible test case which corrupts data in
> 2.4.5.
Why don't you send the test case to the list? I would love to try it
out and it would be a good addition to LTP.
--
Nate Straz
Folks, I believe I have a reproducible test case which corrupts data in
2.4.5.
We do nightly, weekly, and monthly backups by copying our entire /home
partition on the company file server:
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda1 1.9G 1.7G 123M 93% /
/dev/hd
10 matches
Mail list logo
