On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 12:41:49AM +0200, Andreas Bombe wrote:
>
> But the first example contains three newlines, the second just one. A
> thing to keep in mind when going around fixing these multi line strings,
> explicit newlines have to be added.
Some code contains very long lines (around 15
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 01:33:51PM -0400, Horst von Brand wrote:
> Fabian Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> What gcc objects to is stuff like:
>
>"This is a nice long string
> that just goes on
> and on\n"
>
> which is illegal in C AFAIU. It does not object to:
>
>"This long
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 01:33:51PM -0400, Horst von Brand wrote:
>
> What gcc objects to is stuff like:
>
>"This is a nice long string
> that just goes on
> and on\n"
>
> which is illegal in C AFAIU. It does not object to:
>
>"This long string"
>"spans several lines, "
>
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 01:33:51PM -0400, Horst von Brand wrote:
> What gcc objects to is stuff like:
>
>"This is a nice long string
> that just goes on
> and on\n"
>
> which is illegal in C AFAIU. It does not object to:
>
>"This long string"
>"spans several lines, "
>"b
Fabian Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:29:25AM +0400, Anatoly Ivanov wrote:
> > > I hope that lk-developers would fix it one day.
> > Multi-string literals is a nice little ANSI C feature that appears
> > everywhere.
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:29:25AM +0400, Anatoly Ivanov wrote:
> >
> > I hope that lk-developers would fix it one day.
>
> Multi-string literals is a nice little ANSI C feature that appears everywhere.
> Why it is necessary to "fix" them?
I
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:29:25AM +0400, Anatoly Ivanov wrote:
>
> I hope that lk-developers would fix it one day.
Multi-string literals is a nice little ANSI C feature that appears everywhere.
Why it is necessary to "fix" them?
Anuradha
--
Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.6-pre5)
For some rea
As you can see, this is just deprecation warning,
i.e. you can use multi-string literals, but
you'd better don't.
You can forget about these warnings and test ac17
with gcc3.
I hope that lk-developers would fix it one day.
---
avi
Fabian Arias wrote:
> I've just applied the "patch", but te wa
I've just applied the "patch", but te warning still appears. Is this
somthing not to be worried about or is it something serious?
/usr/src/linux-2.4.5/include/asm/checksum.h:161:17: warning: multi-line
string literals are deprecated
I had to come back to 2.95 to test the ac17. Not so happy abou
Hi,
Solution is simple:
change line 540 from "extern struct timeval xtime;"
to "extern volatile struct timeval xtime;"
and have fun :)
---
avi
Kissandrakis S. George wrote:
> Hello
> I suppose that you allready know it
> I have installed gcc v3 released Jun 18 and i tried to compile the
> kern
Hello
I suppose that you allready know it
I have installed gcc v3 released Jun 18 and i tried to compile the
kernel and i got
these errors
in make dep i got several warnings that look like this
/usr/src/linux-2.4.5/include/asm/checksum.h:161:17: warning: multi-line
string literals are deprecated
11 matches
Mail list logo
