Re: 2.4.3-ac9/4 - NFS corruption

2001-05-02 Thread Trond Myklebust
> " " == Raphael Manfredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes, mail is delivered on the server by mailagent, so with > proper local locking. That's not good enough. The NFS client needs to know when it is in sync with the server... > :If so it's completely normal behaviour: the

Re: 2.4.3-ac9/4 - NFS corruption

2001-05-01 Thread Raphael Manfredi
Quoting Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from ml.linux.kernel: :> " " == Raphael Manfredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > An "ls -l" on the file yields: : : > -rw--- 1 ram users 1642491 May 1 00:00 inbox : : > (on the server, and via NFS), which is *abnormal*, since

Re: 2.4.3-ac9/4 - NFS corruption

2001-05-01 Thread Trond Myklebust
> " " == Raphael Manfredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My NFS client runs 2.4.3-ac4 (SMP). My NFS server uses > user-land NFS and runs 2.4.3-ac9 (UP). > I've seens the following in my ~/mail/inbox, NFS mounted: > ^@^@^@^@^@^@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 1 14:47:02 >

2.4.3-ac9/4 - NFS corruption

2001-05-01 Thread Raphael Manfredi
My NFS client runs 2.4.3-ac4 (SMP). My NFS server uses user-land NFS and runs 2.4.3-ac9 (UP). I've seens the following in my ~/mail/inbox, NFS mounted: ^@^@^@^@^@^@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 1 14:47:02 2001 On the server, the same line reads: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 1