Hello!
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > TCP: peer xxx.xxx.1.11:41154/80 shrinks window 2442047470:1072:2442050944.
> > Bad, what else can I say?
> We need desperately to know exactly what OS the xxx.xxx.1.14 machine
> is running. Because you've commented out the first two octets,
David S. Miller wrote:
> We need desperately to know exactly what OS the xxx.xxx.1.14 machine
> is running. Because you've commented out the first two octets, I
> cannot check this myself using nmap.
I see them all the time on my sites. I have active mirrors so they
abound. Here are a few,
Similar situation here: vanilla 2.4.2, with web serving/ftp/hotline/napster/etc.,
and I get this:
TCP: peer 148.75.118.138:1360/6699 shrinks window 3200785160:0:3200795086. Bad, what
else can I say?
TCP: peer 148.75.118.138:1359/6699 shrinks window 3054879436:0:3054885108. Bad, what
else can I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
>
> Jim Woodward writes:
> > This has probably been covered but I saw this message in my logs and
> > wondered what it meant?
> >
> > TCP: peer xxx.xxx.1.11:41154/80 shrinks window 244204
Jim Woodward writes:
> This has probably been covered but I saw this message in my logs and
> wondered what it meant?
>
> TCP: peer xxx.xxx.1.11:41154/80 shrinks window 2442047470:1072:2442050944.
> Bad, what else can I say?
>
> Is it potentially bad? - Ive only ever seen it twice with 2
Hi All,
This has probably been covered but I saw this message in my logs and
wondered what it meant?
TCP: peer xxx.xxx.1.11:41154/80 shrinks window 2442047470:1072:2442050944.
Bad, what else can I say?
Is it potentially bad? - Ive only ever seen it twice with 2.4.x
Regards, Jim.
-
name :
6 matches
Mail list logo
