On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 10:41:48PM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > Hi - I am having compilation troubles on my sparc64 workstation (standard
> > Ultra 5 machine), which is currently running stock 2.4.1 on Red Hat 6.2 quite
> > happily.
>
> We arent tracking the -ac patches at the moment and a
It's a quick change at arch/sparc64/kernel/sys_sparc32.c:907 from:
struct dqblk d;
to:
struct disk_dqblk d;
Compiles and works great on my ultra.
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > Hi - I am having compilation troubles on my sparc64 workstation (standard
> > Ultr
> I have tried upgrading to -ac10 and now -ac12, but both fail during
> compilation (using gcc-2.91.66-sparc) at the same point, in what appears to
> be the sparc32 syscall conversion code:
The -ac tree doesnt currently support sparc because nobody has written the
32/64bit converts for the new
> Hi - I am having compilation troubles on my sparc64 workstation (standard
> Ultra 5 machine), which is currently running stock 2.4.1 on Red Hat 6.2 quite
> happily.
We arent tracking the -ac patches at the moment and alan can't be expected
to ensure it compiles on all architectures. Best bet
Hi - I am having compilation troubles on my sparc64 workstation (standard
Ultra 5 machine), which is currently running stock 2.4.1 on Red Hat 6.2 quite
happily.
I have tried upgrading to -ac10 and now -ac12, but both fail during
compilation (using gcc-2.91.66-sparc) at the same point, in what
5 matches
Mail list logo
