On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 09:54:33AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > So I would think that this block of new major number allocations holds for
> > 2.5 and not 2.4. Also, if I'm correct, 2.4 won't be needing a lot of new
> > major numbers anyhow.
>
> I wouldnt bet on that. Going to a 32bit dev_t interna
> So I would think that this block of new major number allocations holds for
> 2.5 and not 2.4. Also, if I'm correct, 2.4 won't be needing a lot of new
> major numbers anyhow.
I wouldnt bet on that. Going to a 32bit dev_t internally without user space
noticing would keep it seems to be quite doab
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 11:58:39PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Yet another 2.5 project. If Linus wants to go play with name driven devices
> and you want to help him great, but if he'd care to put out
> linux-2.5.0.tar.gz _before_ starting that would be good for all of us
Well, that's one thing. 2.4
3 matches
Mail list logo
