Re: 2.2.20pre2aa1

2001-05-16 Thread Alan Cox
> i'm guessing from your description that the missed event will be noticed > when the next socket arrives. i.e. if the server is pretty busy then the > missed events are not important. but if it's not a busy server, like a > hit every hour, then the missed event may be noticeable to browsers (as

Re: 2.2.20pre2aa1

2001-05-16 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:25:32AM -0700, dean gaudet wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 08:33:05PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote: > > > apache since 1.3.15 has defined SINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT ... > > > > That's definitely a good thing. > > h

Re: 2.2.20pre2aa1

2001-05-16 Thread dean gaudet
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 08:33:05PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote: > > apache since 1.3.15 has defined SINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT ... > > That's definitely a good thing. hmm, i'm not so sure -- 1.3.x is our stable release, and it sounds like this c

Re: 2.2.20pre2aa1

2001-05-16 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 08:33:05PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote: > On Tue, 15 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > o fixed race in wake-one LIFO in accept(2). Apache must be compiled with > > -DSINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT to take advantage of that. > > > > 00_wake-one-4 > > > > Bac

Re: 2.2.20pre2aa1

2001-05-15 Thread dean gaudet
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > o fixed race in wake-one LIFO in accept(2). Apache must be compiled with > -DSINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT to take advantage of that. > > 00_wake-one-4 > > Backport 2.4 waitqueues and in turn fixes an hanging condition in accept(2

2.2.20pre2aa1

2001-05-15 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
The main features of 2.2.20pre2aa1 are: o Support for 4Gigabyte of RAM on IA32 (me and Gerhard Wichert) o Support for 2T of RAM on alpha (me) o RAW-IO (doable with bigmem enabled too). Improvements are also been backported from 2.4. o SMP scheduler improvements