Re: Plans for 2.5

2001-03-31 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2001-03-31T09:36:33, James Lewis Nance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > 4) What is the time frame of releasing 2.5.x-final (or 2.6.x) ? > > wow that's jumping the gun a bit. > But its easy to answer. It will come out about 1 year after whatever > target date we initially set :-) Sorry, s/w

Re: Plans for 2.5

2001-03-31 Thread James Lewis Nance
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 07:54:44PM -0800, Joel Jaeggli wrote: > On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Hen, Shmulik wrote: > > 4) What is the time frame of releasing 2.5.x-final (or 2.6.x) ? > > wow that's jumping the gun a bit. But its easy to answer. It will come out about 1 year after whatever target date we

RE: Plans for 2.5

2001-03-30 Thread Joel Jaeggli
> Linux Advanced Networking Services > Intel Network Communications Group > Jerusalem, Israel > > > -Original Message- > From: Bruno Avila [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 12:45 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:

Re: Plans for 2.5

2001-03-29 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
"Hen, Shmulik" wrote: > > Just some general questions: > > 1) Is there anywhere a list that describes what is intended to be in 2.5.x ? General/Big changes are discussed in: http://lwn.net/2001/0329/a/kernel-summit-agenda.php3 > 2) Are there any early releases of 2.5.x ? > 3) Are the things fo

RE: Plans for 2.5

2001-03-29 Thread Hen, Shmulik
ECTED] Subject: Plans for 2.5 Hello people, I got some questions. When are we going to develop stuff for 2.5? What is planed? My opinion for linux 2.5 should be performance. Since linux already is stable or well done for nature, we could thing more on performance to be a diferencial over o

Re: Plans for 2.5

2001-03-28 Thread James Simmons
> I got some questions. When are we going to develop stuff for 2.5? What >is planed? My opinion for linux 2.5 should be performance. Since linux >already is stable or well done for nature, we could thing more on >performance to be a diferencial over others. What do you people thing? 2.5.X will

Re: Plans for 2.5

2001-03-28 Thread José Luis Domingo López
On Wednesday, 28 March 2001, at 19:44:52 -0300, Bruno Avila wrote: > Hello people, > > I got some questions. When are we going to develop stuff for 2.5? What is > planed? My opinion for linux 2.5 should be performance. Since linux already > is stable or well done for nature, we could thing

Plans for 2.5

2001-03-28 Thread Bruno Avila
Hello people, I got some questions. When are we going to develop stuff for 2.5? What is planed? My opinion for linux 2.5 should be performance. Since linux already is stable or well done for nature, we could thing more on performance to be a diferencial over others. What do you people thi