Re: [workqueue] d5bff968ea: WARNING:at_kernel/workqueue.c:#process_one_work

2021-01-28 Thread Xing Zhengjun
On 1/29/2021 2:08 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 05:09:05PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:52:40 +0800 Xing Zhengjun wrote: [ . . . ] I test the patch 4 times, no warning appears in the kernel log. Thank you so much Zhengjun! And the overall brai

Re: [workqueue] d5bff968ea: WARNING:at_kernel/workqueue.c:#process_one_work

2021-01-28 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 05:09:05PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:52:40 +0800 Xing Zhengjun wrote: [ . . . ] > >I test the patch 4 times, no warning appears in the kernel log. > > Thank you so much Zhengjun! > > And the overall brain dump so far is > > 1/ before and after

Re: [workqueue] d5bff968ea: WARNING:at_kernel/workqueue.c:#process_one_work

2021-01-27 Thread Xing Zhengjun
On 1/27/2021 5:21 PM, Hillf Danton wrote: On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:04:25 +0800 Xing Zhengjun wrote: On 1/26/2021 3:39 PM, Hillf Danton wrote: On 26 Jan 2021 10:45:21 +0800 Xing Zhengjun wrote: On 1/25/2021 5:29 PM, Hillf Danton wrote: On 25 Jan 2021 16:31:32 +0800 Xing Zhengjun wrote: On 1/2

Re: [workqueue] d5bff968ea: WARNING:at_kernel/workqueue.c:#process_one_work

2021-01-27 Thread Xing Zhengjun
On 1/26/2021 3:39 PM, Hillf Danton wrote: On 26 Jan 2021 10:45:21 +0800 Xing Zhengjun wrote: On 1/25/2021 5:29 PM, Hillf Danton wrote: On 25 Jan 2021 16:31:32 +0800 Xing Zhengjun wrote: On 1/22/2021 3:59 PM, Hillf Danton wrote: On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 09:48:32 +0800 Xing Zhengjun wrote: On 1/2

Re: [workqueue] d5bff968ea: WARNING:at_kernel/workqueue.c:#process_one_work

2021-01-26 Thread Xing Zhengjun
On 1/25/2021 5:29 PM, Hillf Danton wrote: On 25 Jan 2021 16:31:32 +0800 Xing Zhengjun wrote: On 1/22/2021 3:59 PM, Hillf Danton wrote: On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 09:48:32 +0800 Xing Zhengjun wrote: On 1/21/2021 12:00 PM, Hillf Danton wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 21:46:33 +0800 Oliver Sang wrote: On

Re: [workqueue] d5bff968ea: WARNING:at_kernel/workqueue.c:#process_one_work

2021-01-25 Thread Xing Zhengjun
On 1/22/2021 3:59 PM, Hillf Danton wrote: On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 09:48:32 +0800 Xing Zhengjun wrote: On 1/21/2021 12:00 PM, Hillf Danton wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 21:46:33 +0800 Oliver Sang wrote: On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 03:24:32PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:45:11 +0800

Re: [workqueue] d5bff968ea: WARNING:at_kernel/workqueue.c:#process_one_work

2021-01-21 Thread Xing Zhengjun
On 1/21/2021 12:00 PM, Hillf Danton wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 21:46:33 +0800 Oliver Sang wrote: On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 03:24:32PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:45:11 +0800 FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9): commit: d5bff968ea9cc005e632d9369c26cbd814

Re: [workqueue] d5bff968ea: WARNING:at_kernel/workqueue.c:#process_one_work

2021-01-20 Thread Oliver Sang
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 03:24:32PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:45:11 +0800 > > > > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9): > > > > commit: d5bff968ea9cc005e632d9369c26cbd8148c93d5 ("workqueue: break > > affinity initiatively") > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit

Re: [workqueue] d5bff968ea: WARNING:at_kernel/workqueue.c:#process_one_work

2021-01-20 Thread Oliver Sang
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:42:48PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:45:11 +0800 > > > > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9): > > > > commit: d5bff968ea9cc005e632d9369c26cbd8148c93d5 ("workqueue: break > > affinity initiatively") > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit