01.04.2017 20:49, H. Peter Anvin пишет:
,linux-ms...@vger.kernel.org,wine-de...@winehq.org
From: h...@zytor.com
Message-ID: <3fd12652-aa83-4d73-9914-bba089e58...@zytor.com>
On April 1, 2017 6:08:43 AM PDT, Stas Sergeev wrote:
30.03.2017 08:14, Ricardo Neri пишет:
You know the wine's
requireme
04.04.2017 05:05, Ricardo Neri пишет:
On Sat, 2017-04-01 at 16:08 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
30.03.2017 08:14, Ricardo Neri пишет:
You know the wine's
requirements now - they are very small. And
dosemu doesn't need anything at all but smsw.
And even smsw is very rare.
But emulation is still ne
Ricardo Neri writes:
> On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 16:11 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>> Ricardo Neri writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 13:10 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>> >> 30.03.2017 08:14, Ricardo Neri пишет:
>> >> In fact, smsw has an interesting property, which is that
>> >> no one will
On Sat, 2017-04-01 at 16:08 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 30.03.2017 08:14, Ricardo Neri пишет:
> >> You know the wine's
> >> requirements now - they are very small. And
> >> dosemu doesn't need anything at all but smsw.
> >> And even smsw is very rare.
> > But emulation is still
On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 16:11 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Ricardo Neri writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 13:10 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> >> 30.03.2017 08:14, Ricardo Neri пишет:
> >> But at least dosemu implements it, so probably it is needed.
> >> >>> Right.
> >> >>>
> >> Of
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 10:49 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> ,linux-ms...@vger.kernel.org,wine-de...@winehq.org
> From: h...@zytor.com
> Message-ID: <3fd12652-aa83-4d73-9914-bba089e58...@zytor.com>
>
> On April 1, 2017 6:08:43 AM PDT, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>>30.03.2017 08:14, Ricardo Neri пишет:
>>
,linux-ms...@vger.kernel.org,wine-de...@winehq.org
From: h...@zytor.com
Message-ID: <3fd12652-aa83-4d73-9914-bba089e58...@zytor.com>
On April 1, 2017 6:08:43 AM PDT, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>30.03.2017 08:14, Ricardo Neri пишет:
>>> You know the wine's
>>> requirements now - they are very sma
30.03.2017 08:14, Ricardo Neri пишет:
You know the wine's
requirements now - they are very small. And
dosemu doesn't need anything at all but smsw.
And even smsw is very rare.
But emulation is still needed for SMSW, right?
Likely so.
If you want, I can enable the logging of this command
and see
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 31.03.2017 17:11, Alexandre Julliard пишет:
>>
>> In fact it would be nice to be able to make sidt/sgdt/etc. segfault
>> too. I know a new syscall is a pain,
>
> Maybe arch_prctl() then?
I still like my idea of a generic mechanism to turn off
31.03.2017 17:11, Alexandre Julliard пишет:
In fact it would be nice to be able to make sidt/sgdt/etc. segfault
too. I know a new syscall is a pain,
Maybe arch_prctl() then?
Ricardo Neri writes:
> On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 13:10 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>> 30.03.2017 08:14, Ricardo Neri пишет:
>> But at least dosemu implements it, so probably it is needed.
>> >>> Right.
>> >>>
>> Of course if it is used by one of 100 DOS progs, then there
>> is an option
On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 13:10 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 30.03.2017 08:14, Ricardo Neri пишет:
> But at least dosemu implements it, so probably it is needed.
> >>> Right.
> >>>
> Of course if it is used by one of 100 DOS progs, then there
> is an option to just add its support to dos
30.03.2017 08:14, Ricardo Neri пишет:
But at least dosemu implements it, so probably it is needed.
Right.
Of course if it is used by one of 100 DOS progs, then there
is an option to just add its support to dosemu2 and pretend
the compatibility problems did not exist. :)
Do you mean relaying t
On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 23:55 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 29.03.2017 07:38, Ricardo Neri пишет:
> >> Probably you could also remove
> >> the sldt and str emulation for protected mode, because,
> >> as I understand from this thread, wine does not
> >> need those.
> > I see. I would lean on keeping th
11.03.2017 02:59, Ricardo Neri пишет:
On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 14:33 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
Why would you need one?
Or do you really want to allow these instructions
in v86 by the means of emulation? If so - this wasn't
clearly stated in the patch description, neither it was
properly discussed
29.03.2017 07:38, Ricardo Neri пишет:
Probably you could also remove
the sldt and str emulation for protected mode, because,
as I understand from this thread, wine does not
need those.
I see. I would lean on keeping the emulation because I already
implemented it :), for completeness, and because
On Tue, 2017-03-28 at 12:38 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 28.03.2017 02:46, Ricardo Neri пишет:
> > On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 00:25 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> >> 11.03.2017 02:59, Ricardo Neri пишет:
> >>> On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 14:33 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> >>>
> Why would you need one?
> >>
28.03.2017 02:46, Ricardo Neri пишет:
On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 00:25 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
11.03.2017 02:59, Ricardo Neri пишет:
On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 14:33 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
Why would you need one?
Or do you really want to allow these instructions
in v86 by the means of emulation?
On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 00:25 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 11.03.2017 02:59, Ricardo Neri пишет:
> > On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 14:33 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> >
> >> Why would you need one?
> >> Or do you really want to allow these instructions
> >> in v86 by the means of emulation? If so - this wasn'
On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 06:17 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 3:33 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> > 10.03.2017 05:39, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
> >
> >> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> >>>
> >>> 09.03.2017 04:15, Ricardo Neri пишет:
> >>>
> On Wed, 2017-03
On Sat, 2017-03-11 at 02:58 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 11.03.2017 02:47, Ricardo Neri пишет:
> >>
> It doesn't need to be a matter of this particular
> patch set, i.e. this proposal should not trigger a
> v7 resend of all 21 patches. :) But it would be useful
> for the future
On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 14:33 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 10.03.2017 05:39, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
> > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> >> 09.03.2017 04:15, Ricardo Neri пишет:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 08:46 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:
11.03.2017 02:47, Ricardo Neri пишет:
It doesn't need to be a matter of this particular
patch set, i.e. this proposal should not trigger a
v7 resend of all 21 patches. :) But it would be useful
for the future development of dosemu2.
Would dosemu2 use 32-bit processes in order to keep segmentat
On Thu, 2017-03-09 at 18:39 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> > 09.03.2017 04:15, Ricardo Neri пишет:
> >
> >> On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 08:46 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>
> >>>
On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 01:01 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 09.03.2017 03:46, Ricardo Neri пишет:
> > On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 17:08 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> >> 08.03.2017 03:32, Ricardo Neri пишет:
> >>> These are the instructions covered by UMIP:
> >>> * SGDT - Store Global Descriptor Table
> >>> *
11.03.2017 00:04, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
10.03.2017 05:41, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Ricardo Neri
wrote:
On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 19:53 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
08.03.2017 19:46, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
No no,
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 10.03.2017 05:41, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Ricardo Neri
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 19:53 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
08.03.2017 19:46, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
>>
>> No no, since
10.03.2017 05:41, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Ricardo Neri
wrote:
On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 19:53 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
08.03.2017 19:46, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
No no, since I meant prot mode, this is not what I need.
I would never need to disable UMIP as to allow
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 3:33 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 10.03.2017 05:39, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>>>
>>> 09.03.2017 04:15, Ricardo Neri пишет:
>>>
On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 08:46 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017
10.03.2017 05:39, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
09.03.2017 04:15, Ricardo Neri пишет:
On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 08:46 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
08.03.2017 19:06, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
On Wed,
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Ricardo Neri
wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 19:53 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>> 08.03.2017 19:46, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
>> >> No no, since I meant prot mode, this is not what I need.
>> >> I would never need to disable UMIP as to allow the
>> >> prot mode apps to d
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 09.03.2017 04:15, Ricardo Neri пишет:
>
>> On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 08:46 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
08.03.2017 19:06, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017
09.03.2017 03:46, Ricardo Neri пишет:
On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 17:08 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
08.03.2017 03:32, Ricardo Neri пишет:
These are the instructions covered by UMIP:
* SGDT - Store Global Descriptor Table
* SIDT - Store Interrupt Descriptor Table
* SLDT - Store Local Descriptor Table
*
09.03.2017 04:15, Ricardo Neri пишет:
On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 08:46 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
08.03.2017 19:06, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:08 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
08.03.2017 03:32, Ricardo Neri пишет:
These are t
09.03.2017 04:11, Ricardo Neri пишет:
On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 19:53 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
08.03.2017 19:46, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
No no, since I meant prot mode, this is not what I need.
I would never need to disable UMIP as to allow the
prot mode apps to do SLDT. Instead it would be good
t
On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 17:08 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 08.03.2017 03:32, Ricardo Neri пишет:
> > These are the instructions covered by UMIP:
> > * SGDT - Store Global Descriptor Table
> > * SIDT - Store Interrupt Descriptor Table
> > * SLDT - Store Local Descriptor Table
> > * SMSW - Store Machin
On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 08:46 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> > 08.03.2017 19:06, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:08 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> >>>
> >>> 08.03.2017 03:32, Ricardo Neri пишет:
>
> These are the
On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 19:53 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 08.03.2017 19:46, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
> >> No no, since I meant prot mode, this is not what I need.
> >> I would never need to disable UMIP as to allow the
> >> prot mode apps to do SLDT. Instead it would be good
> >> to have an ability to
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:08 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 08.03.2017 03:32, Ricardo Neri пишет:
>>
>> These are the instructions covered by UMIP:
>> * SGDT - Store Global Descriptor Table
>> * SIDT - Store Interrupt Descriptor Table
>> * SLDT - Store Local Descriptor Table
>> * SMSW - Store Machine St
08.03.2017 19:06, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:08 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
08.03.2017 03:32, Ricardo Neri пишет:
These are the instructions covered by UMIP:
* SGDT - Store Global Descriptor Table
* SIDT - Store Interrupt Descriptor Table
* SLDT - Store Local Descriptor Table
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 08.03.2017 19:06, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:08 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>>>
>>> 08.03.2017 03:32, Ricardo Neri пишет:
These are the instructions covered by UMIP:
* SGDT - Store Global Descriptor Table
08.03.2017 19:46, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
No no, since I meant prot mode, this is not what I need.
I would never need to disable UMIP as to allow the
prot mode apps to do SLDT. Instead it would be good
to have an ability to provide a replacement for the dummy
emulation that is currently being prop
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Ricardo Neri
wrote:
> This is v6 of this series. The five previous submissions can be found
> here [1], here [2], here[3], here[4], and here[5]. This version addresses
> the comments received in v4 plus improvements of the handling of emulation
> in 64-bit builds. P
08.03.2017 03:32, Ricardo Neri пишет:
These are the instructions covered by UMIP:
* SGDT - Store Global Descriptor Table
* SIDT - Store Interrupt Descriptor Table
* SLDT - Store Local Descriptor Table
* SMSW - Store Machine Status Word
* STR - Store Task Register
This patchset initially treated
This is v6 of this series. The five previous submissions can be found
here [1], here [2], here[3], here[4], and here[5]. This version addresses
the comments received in v4 plus improvements of the handling of emulation
in 64-bit builds. Please see details in the change log.
=== What is UMIP?
User
45 matches
Mail list logo
