On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 3:22 AM Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>
> On 1/28/21 10:22 PM, Yang Shi wrote:
> >> > @@ -266,12 +265,13 @@ int alloc_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> >> > static int expand_shrinker_maps(int new_id)
> >> > {
> >> > int size, old_size, ret = 0;
> >> > + int ne
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:53 AM Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>
> On 1/28/21 12:33 AM, Yang Shi wrote:
> > Both memcg_shrinker_map_size and shrinker_nr_max is maintained, but
> > actually the
> > map size can be calculated via shrinker_nr_max, so it seems unnecessary to
> > keep both.
> > Remove memcg_
On 1/28/21 12:33 AM, Yang Shi wrote:
> Both memcg_shrinker_map_size and shrinker_nr_max is maintained, but actually
> the
> map size can be calculated via shrinker_nr_max, so it seems unnecessary to
> keep both.
> Remove memcg_shrinker_map_size since shrinker_nr_max is also used by
> iterating t
Both memcg_shrinker_map_size and shrinker_nr_max is maintained, but actually the
map size can be calculated via shrinker_nr_max, so it seems unnecessary to keep
both.
Remove memcg_shrinker_map_size since shrinker_nr_max is also used by iterating
the
bit map.
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi
---
mm/vmsc
4 matches
Mail list logo
