On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:55:09 +0200
Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
> > > it jumps to the label 'out' instead of 'fail' by mistake.In the result,
> …
> >
> > Looks good to me.
>
> * Do you care for a typo in this change description?
>
> * Would you like to read any improved (patch) version description
…
> > it jumps to the label 'out' instead of 'fail' by mistake.In the result,
…
>
> Looks good to me.
* Do you care for a typo in this change description?
* Would you like to read any improved (patch) version descriptions (or
changelogs)?
Regards,
Markus
Hi LuMing,
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 08:23:47 +0100
lumingyindet...@126.com wrote:
> From: LuMingYin
>
> If traceprobe_parse_probe_arg_body() failed to allocate 'parg->fmt',
> it jumps to the label 'out' instead of 'fail' by mistake.In the result,
> the buffer 'tmp' is not freed in this case and leak
> … by mistake.In the result,
…
I propose once more to start the second sentence of this change description
on a subsequent line.
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_probe.c | 2 +-
…
Unfortunately, you overlooked to add patch version descriptions behind the
ma
From: LuMingYin
If traceprobe_parse_probe_arg_body() failed to allocate 'parg->fmt',
it jumps to the label 'out' instead of 'fail' by mistake.In the result,
the buffer 'tmp' is not freed in this case and leaks its memory.
Thus jump to the label 'fail' in that error case.
Fixes: 032330abd08b ("t
5 matches
Mail list logo