On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 08:44 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 12/23/2016 05:37 PM, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > Other kernel submodules can benefit from using the utility functions
> > defined in mpx.c to obtain the addresses and values of operands contained
> > in the general purpose registers. An instanc
On 12/23/2016 05:37 PM, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> Other kernel submodules can benefit from using the utility functions
> defined in mpx.c to obtain the addresses and values of operands contained
> in the general purpose registers. An instance of this is the emulation code
> used for instructions protec
On Sun, 2016-12-25 at 15:17 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi Ricado,
>
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 17:37:41 -0800
> Ricardo Neri wrote:
>
> > Other kernel submodules can benefit from using the utility functions
> > defined in mpx.c to obtain the addresses and values of operands contained
> > in the
Hi Ricado,
On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 17:37:41 -0800
Ricardo Neri wrote:
> Other kernel submodules can benefit from using the utility functions
> defined in mpx.c to obtain the addresses and values of operands contained
> in the general purpose registers. An instance of this is the emulation code
> use
Hi Ricardo,
[auto build test WARNING on tip/auto-latest]
[also build test WARNING on v4.9 next-20161223]
[cannot apply to tip/x86/core]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Ricardo-Ner
Other kernel submodules can benefit from using the utility functions
defined in mpx.c to obtain the addresses and values of operands contained
in the general purpose registers. An instance of this is the emulation code
used for instructions protected by the Intel User-Mode Instruction
Prevention fe
6 matches
Mail list logo
