On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 05:42:58PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> BTW we can also save power by allowing the user to choose to disable
> hotplugging support. Then we can power down PHYs that are not in use.
>
> That requires the addition of some policy controls, because it is
> user-specific whet
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
This is a patch (very ugly, assumes you have just one disk) to bring
powersaving to AHCI. You need Alan's SCSI autosuspend (attached) patch
as a base.
It saves .5W compared to config with disk spinning, and even .15W
compared to hdparm -y... on my thinkpad x60 anyway.
Mark Lord wrote:
Pavel Machek wrote:
This is a patch (very ugly, assumes you have just one disk) to bring
powersaving to AHCI. You need Alan's SCSI autosuspend (attached) patch
as a base.
It saves .5W compared to config with disk spinning, and even .15W
compared to hdparm -y... on my thinkpad x
Hi!
>> This is a patch (very ugly, assumes you have just one disk) to bring
>> powersaving to AHCI. You need Alan's SCSI autosuspend (attached) patch
>> as a base.
>>
>> It saves .5W compared to config with disk spinning, and even .15W
>> compared to hdparm -y... on my thinkpad x60 anyway.
> ..
>
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
This is a patch (very ugly, assumes you have just one disk) to bring
powersaving to AHCI. You need Alan's SCSI autosuspend (attached) patch
as a base.
It saves .5W compared to config with disk spinning, and even .15W
compared to hdparm -y... on my thinkpad x60 anyway.
.
Hi!
This is a patch (very ugly, assumes you have just one disk) to bring
powersaving to AHCI. You need Alan's SCSI autosuspend (attached) patch
as a base.
It saves .5W compared to config with disk spinning, and even .15W
compared to hdparm -y... on my thinkpad x60 anyway.
It is also mandatory fi
6 matches
Mail list logo
