Hey Peter,
Yes, a cleanup there is way welcome. Please remove my name indeed, as
it doesn't make sense at this point, the lists should suffice.
I'll keep looking at the patches and try to review them for sure.
Cheers and thanks again for stepping in.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Peter Huewe
Hi Jason,
> > Speaking of which, has anyone looked at the rest of my series?? Shall
> > I repost it?
> Jason Gunthorpe:
> tpm: Pull everything related to /dev/tpmX into tpm-dev.c
> tpm: Pull everything related to sysfs into tpm-sysfs.c
> tpm: Create a tpm_class_ops structure and use it in the driv
> These would have been posted as patch numbers 8 through 13 in the
> original series.
>
> I think what happened is at this point in the series module compile
> broke. That is fixed now in the for-james pull, so the rest of the
> series should be looked at.
>
> Peter's checkpatch clean up will c
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:01:19PM -0500, Ashley Lai wrote:
>
> > Agreed, there are still lots of patches to go before the subsystem
> > meets the current kernel standard..
> >
> > Speaking of which, has anyone looked at the rest of my series?? Shall
> > I repost it?
>
> Jason,
> Are you refer
> Agreed, there are still lots of patches to go before the subsystem
> meets the current kernel standard..
>
> Speaking of which, has anyone looked at the rest of my series?? Shall
> I repost it?
Jason,
Are you referring to the for-tpm branch on github?
https://github.com/jgunthorpe/linux/comm
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 01:10:28AM +0200, Peter Huewe wrote:
> Thanks for the offer - I think I can handle the maintenance effort
> itself, HOWEVER I would really like to see you sticking around here
> as a reviewer, due to your experience, especially for the stuff I'm
> submitting.
Agreed, there
Hi Rajiv,
> Long time, no see..
Good to see you again.
> Peter, thank you a ton for stepping in.
> Since you're of course the owner (yes, we need such figure),
> let me know if my help is desirable or if you think there isn't
> additional bandwidth needed to maintain it.
Thanks for the offer - I
Hi everyone,
Long time, no see..
I stopped being active (administrative-wise specially) since I handed
it over to Kent. Now that he stepped down, I can come back at my own
private time.
Peter, thank you a ton for stepping in. Since you're of course the
owner (yes, we need such figure), let me kn
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 07:36:50PM +0200, Peter Huewe wrote:
> Since I'm actively maintaining the tpm subsystem for a few months now,
> it's time to step up and be an official maintainer for the tpm subsystem,
> atleast until I hear something different from my company.
Sounds good!
As others have
>> I have no objection to you adding yourself here. I do think we should
>> probably also cut the list down at the same time as I don't think all
>> the listed maintainers are active anymore. Also, the list is getting a
>> bit unwieldy. If everyone maintains it nobody maintains it.
>
> I agree wi
Once I'm not contributing anything since I was singed to Maintainers
in replace to Kent, please you can remove my name of there.
Thanks,
Leonidas.
In-Reply-To: <5266bc18.1080...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:55:36PM -0500, Joel Schopp wrote:
> On 10/22/2013 12:36 PM, Peter H
I know how to reach Rajiv. Let me ping him. (I am not copying him
here for privacy.)
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Ashley D Lai wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 21:33 +0200, Peter Huewe wrote:
>> Hi Joel,
>>
>> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Oktober 2013 um 19:55 Uhr
>> > Von: "Joel Schopp"
>>
>>
On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 21:33 +0200, Peter Huewe wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Oktober 2013 um 19:55 Uhr
> > Von: "Joel Schopp"
>
> > I have no objection to you adding yourself here. I do think we should
> > probably also cut the list down at the same time as I don't think all
>
Hi Joel,
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Oktober 2013 um 19:55 Uhr
> Von: "Joel Schopp"
> I have no objection to you adding yourself here. I do think we should
> probably also cut the list down at the same time as I don't think all
> the listed maintainers are active anymore. Also, the list is getting
On 10/22/2013 12:36 PM, Peter Huewe wrote:
> Since I'm actively maintaining the tpm subsystem for a few months now,
> it's time to step up and be an official maintainer for the tpm subsystem,
> atleast until I hear something different from my company.
>
> The maintaining is done solely in my priva
15 matches
Mail list logo
