On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:42:51PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 15:24 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 07:58:37PM +0100, Peter Huewe wrote:
> >
> > > > In practice, I suspect that a single user space application won't
> > > > support both TPMs.
>
On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 15:24 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 07:58:37PM +0100, Peter Huewe wrote:
>
> > > In practice, I suspect that a single user space application won't
> > > support both TPMs.
> > Think of init scripts.
> > Which daemon should it start?
>
> Right, idea
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 07:58:37PM +0100, Peter Huewe wrote:
> >In practice, I suspect that a single user space application won't
> >support both TPMs.
> Think of init scripts.
> Which daemon should it start?
Right, ideally we'd have a udev rule that triggers systemd to start
the userspace daemo
Am 14. März 2017 19:18:15 MEZ schrieb Ken Goldman :
>On 3/13/2017 3:10 AM, Peter Huewe wrote:
>
>> And yes you are right there is currently no way, except for trial and
>> error, for the userspace to determine this. So an interface to get
>> this information makes sense to me.
>
>In practice, I s
On 3/13/2017 3:10 AM, Peter Huewe wrote:
And yes you are right there is currently no way, except for trial and
error, for the userspace to determine this. So an interface to get
this information makes sense to me.
In practice, I suspect that a single user space application won't
support both T
5 matches
Mail list logo
