Hi Amon,
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 09:28:38AM +0100, Amon Ott wrote:
> On Donnerstag 24 Februar 2005 01:55, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> > If you apply them (and I hope Linus will), capabilities is default
> > and you can replace that by loading an LSM. You can stack capability
> > on top of the primary LS
On Donnerstag 24 Februar 2005 01:55, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 11:19:16AM +0100, Amon Ott wrote:
> > Without rechecking the current state: At least the last time I
> > checked, the hardwired kernel capabilities were explicitely
disabled
> > when LSM got switched on. You had t
Hi Amon,
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 11:19:16AM +0100, Amon Ott wrote:
> > -> 5. Posix Capabilities Without Stacking Support
> >
> > I don't get the point of these claims.
> > The LSM framework currently has full support for dynamic and
> > logic-changeable POSIX.1e capabilities, using the capable()
--- Amon Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Montag 21 Februar 2005 18:50, Casey Schaufler
> wrote:
> >
> > --- Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > There are cases where Linux DAC and MAC cannot
> > > live happily together,
> > > > because Linux DA
On Montag 21 Februar 2005 18:50, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>
> --- Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
> > > There are cases where Linux DAC and MAC cannot
> > live happily together,
> > > because Linux DAC is too limited.
> >
> > Agreed.
>
> OKay, I'll bite. MAC and
--- Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > There are cases where Linux DAC and MAC cannot
> live happily together,
> > because Linux DAC is too limited.
>
> Agreed.
OKay, I'll bite. MAC and DAC are seperate.
How is it that (the limited nature of) the DAC
behavior makes
El lun, 21-02-2005 a las 11:19 +0100, Amon Ott escribió:
> Hi folks,
>
> this is a late reply, because I was away for a week
Hey ao, I was looking for you last week, nice to know you're back
again ;)
>
> Documentation is a general problem in all projects, not only the
> kernel. For me, this ha
Hi folks,
this is a late reply, because I was away for a week.
On Dienstag 15 Februar 2005 23:38, Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro
wrote:
> The purpose of this email is not re-opening the old flame on the
> anti-LSM "pleas" that were subject of many discussion and
> disappointments in certain dev
8 matches
Mail list logo
