Re: [rfc] exposing MMR's of on-chip peripherals for debugging purposes

2008-01-28 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Jan 28, 2008 7:08 PM, Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Could you submit the XML files and the autogeneration code? The C file > > isn't really source. Not only is it big, it'll probably change around a > > whole lot when you make small

Re: [rfc] exposing MMR's of on-chip peripherals for debugging purposes

2008-01-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Jan 28, 2008 7:08 PM, Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Jan 28, 2008 8:04 AM, richard kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > there is a lot of duplication in your file, but you could slim it down a > > > bit if thats the only objecti

Re: [rfc] exposing MMR's of on-chip peripherals for debugging purposes

2008-01-28 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Jan 28, 2008 8:04 AM, richard kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Jan 28, 2008 5:40 AM, Bryan Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 05:16 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > >>> the trouble is that

Re: [rfc] exposing MMR's of on-chip peripherals for debugging purposes

2008-01-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Jan 28, 2008 8:04 AM, richard kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Jan 28, 2008 5:40 AM, Bryan Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 05:16 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >>> the trouble is that this file currently weighs in at ~1.8 megs. this > >>

Re: [rfc] exposing MMR's of on-chip peripherals for debugging purposes

2008-01-28 Thread richard kennedy
Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Jan 28, 2008 5:40 AM, Bryan Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 05:16 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> the trouble is that this file currently weighs in at ~1.8 megs. this >>> is because it contains all the information for all Blackfin processors >>> w

Re: [rfc] exposing MMR's of on-chip peripherals for debugging purposes

2008-01-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Jan 28, 2008 5:40 AM, Bryan Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 05:16 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > the trouble is that this file currently weighs in at ~1.8 megs. this > > is because it contains all the information for all Blackfin processors > > we support (which currentl

Re: [rfc] exposing MMR's of on-chip peripherals for debugging purposes

2008-01-28 Thread Bryan Wu
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 05:16 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > we have guys who maintain xml descriptions of all Blackfin processors. > these include an exhaustive list of all the peripherals and their > MMRs. for example, there is an element that binds the address, the > MMR name (as described in t

Re: [rfc] exposing MMR's of on-chip peripherals for debugging purposes

2008-01-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Jan 28, 2008 5:16 AM, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the trouble is that this file currently weighs in at ~1.8 megs. this > is because it contains all the information for all Blackfin processors > we support (which currently, is about ~23 variants). it's only going > to get bigger

[rfc] exposing MMR's of on-chip peripherals for debugging purposes

2008-01-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
we have guys who maintain xml descriptions of all Blackfin processors. these include an exhaustive list of all the peripherals and their MMRs. for example, there is an element that binds the address, the MMR name (as described in the processor's hardware manual), the bit size of it, and all those