On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:22:12PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:20:14PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:42:17PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:39:47PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:20:14PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:42:17PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:39:47PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > > @@ -123,9 +129,39 @@ static
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 06:17:37PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:05:17AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> > > emptied out their page p
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:42:17PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:39:47PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> > > emptied out their page po
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:57:14AM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Not at this time, I'll try to look into that. For now, I am updating
> the patch to revert the shrinker back to DEFAULT_SEEKS and change the
> object count to only include objects above a certain threshold, which
> assumes a worst-
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:39:47PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> > emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> > entries in their place, which
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 02:06:07PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:50:17AM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 02:03:58PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 06:17:37PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:50:17AM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 02:03:58PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 06:17:37PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:05:17AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 0
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 02:03:58PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 06:17:37PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:05:17AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > > + /* Only shadow en
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 06:17:37PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:05:17AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > + /* Only shadow entries in there, keep track of this node */
> > > + if (!(node->count & RADIX
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:05:17AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> > emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> > entries in their place, which
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
> themselves are reclaimed. This
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 01:55:01PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
> Hi Johannes,
>
> On 01/11/2014 02:10 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> > emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> > entries in their place, which are
Hi Johannes,
On 01/11/2014 02:10 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
> themselves are reclaimed. This is p
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:39:47PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> > emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> > entries in their place, which
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
> themselves are reclaimed. This
On 01/10/2014 01:10 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
> themselves are reclaimed. This is problematic for
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
themselves are reclaimed. This is problematic for bigger files that
are still in use after they have a s
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 09:10:52AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 02:21:48PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> > emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> > entries in their place, which
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 02:21:48PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
> themselves are reclaimed. This
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
themselves are reclaimed. This is problematic for bigger files that
are still in use after they have a s
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 06:00:10PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:29:37AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 04:27:25PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:49:21AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 0
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:29:37AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 04:27:25PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:49:21AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:38:28PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > > Previously, page cache ra
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 04:27:25PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:49:21AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:38:28PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> > > emptied out their page p
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 04:13:32PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:38:28 -0500 Johannes Weiner wrote:
>
> > Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> > emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> > entries in their place, which a
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:49:21AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:38:28PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> > emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> > entries in their place, which
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:38:28 -0500 Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
> themselves are reclaimed. This is pr
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:38:28PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
> themselves are reclaimed. This
Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
themselves are reclaimed. This is problematic for bigger files that
are still in use after they have a s
29 matches
Mail list logo
