On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 09:18:25AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> Great, thank you. BTW, I have managed to test original patch set on a
> Macboot Air of my friend with usb boot, it works ok.
Ok, that's actually a very good news - the apples tend to be special wrt
uefi implementation.
--
Regards/Grus
On 10/31/13 at 11:44am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Dear Mr. Young,
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:07:14AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > But Frankly I'd like to see them in list instead even with only small
> > > fixes
> > > beacuse in this way there might be more people to review it carefully.
> >
On 10/31/13 at 11:45am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:07:45PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > You can use git for your own purposes, still.
>
> git mk-coffee --refill --now
Ccing Jonathan Corbet ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:07:45PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> You can use git for your own purposes, still.
git mk-coffee --refill --now
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linu
Dear Mr. Young,
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:07:14AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > But Frankly I'd like to see them in list instead even with only small fixes
> > beacuse in this way there might be more people to review it carefully.
>
> There's another shorcoming for keeping new patches in git is t
On 10/30/2013 07:07 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> On 10/31/13 at 10:04am, Dave Young wrote:
>> On 10/30/13 at 11:47am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:03:49AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
Will try, but please keep the posted patches in mailing list up-to-date,
>>>
>>> Would you lik
On 10/31/13 at 10:04am, Dave Young wrote:
> On 10/30/13 at 11:47am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:03:49AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > Will try, but please keep the posted patches in mailing list up-to-date,
> >
> > Would you like me to send them to you privately?
>
> Th
On 10/30/13 at 11:47am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:03:49AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > Will try, but please keep the posted patches in mailing list up-to-date,
>
> Would you like me to send them to you privately?
Thanks, do not bother to send me privately I can get it fr
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:03:49AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> Will try, but please keep the posted patches in mailing list up-to-date,
Would you like me to send them to you privately?
> I'm an old-fashioned person, do not tend to depend on git.
Really? You should change that - you're missing out
On 10/29/13 at 02:43pm, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:32:03AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > I remember I tried your efi branch, but the code is different from
> > what you sent to list, thus I turned to use the mbox patches.
>
> Yeah, please use the #efi branch as I keep refre
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:32:03AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> I remember I tried your efi branch, but the code is different from
> what you sent to list, thus I turned to use the mbox patches.
Yeah, please use the #efi branch as I keep refreshing it with the newest
changes. They're hopefully not s
> >
> > 3. Then I merged the 'efi' branch of
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bp/bp.git ontop.
>
> I used the patches from mailbox directly.
> Fixed an conflict and merge them one by one.
I remember I tried your efi branch, but the code is different
from what you sent to list, t
On 10/28/13 at 03:58pm, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 07:24:58PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > I use linus tree, git pull Matt's efi-next tree, then apply your 12
> > patches and my patches. I applied your previous 11 patches + the last
> > update patch 12/12, but the last one doe
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 07:24:58PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> I use linus tree, git pull Matt's efi-next tree, then apply your 12
> patches and my patches. I applied your previous 11 patches + the last
> update patch 12/12, but the last one does not apply, I manually shift
> a hunk to make it apply
On 10/28/13 at 12:20pm, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 06:10:11PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > Sorry, I have not any public git account. Attached the patch I applied
> > with git
>
> Still doesn't work:
>
> $ patch -p1 --dry-run -i /tmp/02-efi-enter-virtual-mode-cleanup-1.patch.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 06:10:11PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> Sorry, I have not any public git account. Attached the patch I applied
> with git
Still doesn't work:
$ patch -p1 --dry-run -i /tmp/02-efi-enter-virtual-mode-cleanup-1.patch.new
checking file arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
Hunk #1 succee
On 10/28/13 at 06:10pm, Dave Young wrote:
> On 10/28/13 at 11:04am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 05:51:17PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > It does have a warning, but it applied successfully, no idea though:
> > > patches/02-efi-enter-virtual-mode-cleanup.patch
> > > Applying
On 10/28/13 at 11:04am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 05:51:17PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > It does have a warning, but it applied successfully, no idea though:
> > patches/02-efi-enter-virtual-mode-cleanup.patch
> > Applying: Cleanup efi_enter_virtual_mode function
> > /home/
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 05:51:17PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> It does have a warning, but it applied successfully, no idea though:
> patches/02-efi-enter-virtual-mode-cleanup.patch
> Applying: Cleanup efi_enter_virtual_mode function
> /home/dave/git/efi/.git/rebase-apply/patch:42: space before tab
On 10/28/13 at 05:40pm, Dave Young wrote:
> On 10/28/13 at 10:32am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:47:16AM +0800, dyo...@redhat.com wrote:
> > > Add two small functions:
> > > efi_merge_regions and efi_map_regions, efi_enter_virtual_mode
> > > calls them instead of embedding
On 10/28/13 at 10:32am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:47:16AM +0800, dyo...@redhat.com wrote:
> > Add two small functions:
> > efi_merge_regions and efi_map_regions, efi_enter_virtual_mode
> > calls them instead of embedding two long for loop.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Youn
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:47:16AM +0800, dyo...@redhat.com wrote:
> Add two small functions:
> efi_merge_regions and efi_map_regions, efi_enter_virtual_mode
> calls them instead of embedding two long for loop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Young
> ---
> arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 83
> +
Add two small functions:
efi_merge_regions and efi_map_regions, efi_enter_virtual_mode
calls them instead of embedding two long for loop.
Signed-off-by: Dave Young
---
arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 83 +++-
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 31 deletions(
23 matches
Mail list logo
