On Tuesday 17 April 2007 8:10 pm, Len Brown wrote:
> On Thursday 12 April 2007 17:14, David Brownell wrote:
> > --- g26.orig/drivers/acpi/glue.c2007-04-12 10:56:35.0 -0700
> > +++ g26/drivers/acpi/glue.c 2007-04-12 10:56:35.0 -0700
> > @@ -316,13 +316,19 @@ static int __init ac
On Thursday 12 April 2007 17:14, David Brownell wrote:
> This works around a bug seen in some RTC-related ACPI table entries, and
> tweaks related diagnostics to follow the ACPI convention.
>
> The bug prevents misleading boot-time messages: platforms affected by this
> bug wrongly report they ca
This works around a bug seen in some RTC-related ACPI table entries, and
tweaks related diagnostics to follow the ACPI convention.
The bug prevents misleading boot-time messages: platforms affected by this
bug wrongly report they can support alarms up to one year in the future,
when in fact the l
3 matches
Mail list logo