Re: [patch 2.6.13-rc6] docs: fix misinformation about overcommit_memory

2005-08-20 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 11:14:39PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > Someone complained about the docs for vm_overcommit_memory being wrong. > This patch copies the text from the vm documentation into procfs. > Please apply. >... Do we really need two copies of the same text? Couldn't you instead wri

Re: [patch 2.6.13-rc6] docs: fix misinformation about overcommit_memory

2005-08-20 Thread Chuck Ebbert
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:24:26 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > +Controls overcommit of system memory: > > It should explain what "overcommit" is. Here is an improved version. Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Documentation/filesystems

Re: [patch 2.6.13-rc6] docs: fix misinformation about overcommit_memory

2005-08-19 Thread Andrew Morton
Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +Controls overcommit of system memory: It should explain what "overcommit" is. > + > +0 - Heuristic overcommit handling. Obvious overcommits of > +address space are refused. Used for a typical system. It > +ensures a

[patch 2.6.13-rc6] docs: fix misinformation about overcommit_memory

2005-08-19 Thread Chuck Ebbert
Someone complained about the docs for vm_overcommit_memory being wrong. This patch copies the text from the vm documentation into procfs. Please apply. Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt | 29 +++-- 1 files changed, 19 inse