Re: [patch 2/4] Add HAVE_OPROFILE

2007-12-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 10:32:57 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ config PROFILING > config OPROFILE > tristate "OProfile system profiling (EXPERIMENTAL)" > depends on PROFILING && !UML > - depends on ALPHA || ARM || AVR32 || BLACKFIN || X86_32 ||

[patch 2/4] Add HAVE_OPROFILE

2007-12-08 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
Linus: On the per-architecture side, I do think it would be better to *not* have internal architecture knowledge in a generic file, and as such a line like depends on X86_32 || IA64 || PPC || S390 || SPARC64 || X86_64 || AVR32 really shouldn't exist in a file like kernel/Kconfig.instrumen

[patch 2/4] Add HAVE_OPROFILE

2007-12-04 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
Linus: On the per-architecture side, I do think it would be better to *not* have internal architecture knowledge in a generic file, and as such a line like depends on X86_32 || IA64 || PPC || S390 || SPARC64 || X86_64 || AVR32 really shouldn't exist in a file like kernel/Kconfig.instrumen

Re: [patch 2/4] Add HAVE_OPROFILE

2007-11-16 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:30:59 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Linus: > On the per-architecture side, I do think it would be better to *not* have > internal architecture knowledge in a generic file, and as such a line like > > depends on X86_32 || IA64 || PPC || S390 ||

[patch 2/4] Add HAVE_OPROFILE

2007-11-15 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
Linus: On the per-architecture side, I do think it would be better to *not* have internal architecture knowledge in a generic file, and as such a line like depends on X86_32 || IA64 || PPC || S390 || SPARC64 || X86_64 || AVR32 really shouldn't exist in a file like kernel/Kconfig.instrumen