Re: [patch 1/2] kstrdup: implementation

On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 05:51 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > This is a good example why development against Linus' tree is ofter > pointless: Seriously. > A similar patch is already in -mm. But...woohoo! Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel

Re: [patch 1/2] kstrdup: implementation

On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:41:15PM -0400, Robert Love wrote: > Rusty and I's LCA kernel tutorial again brought up kstrdup(). Let's > close this never ending saga and provide a standard kernel > implementation. >... This is a good example why development against Linus' tree is ofter pointless:

[patch 1/2] kstrdup: implementation

Rusty and I's LCA kernel tutorial again brought up kstrdup(). Let's close this never ending saga and provide a standard kernel implementation. As an example of the savings from such a patch, there are a handful of existing strdup() implementations and what looks like 100s of open coded strdup() u